Supreme Court

Defamation Case: SC Extends Order Exempting Shivraj Singh Chouhan From Personal Appearance

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Supreme Court on Wednesday extended its previous order exempting Union Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan from personal appearance before a trial court in a criminal defamation case.

The case was filed against him by Congress MP and senior advocate Vivek Tankha.

A bench comprising Justices MM Sundresh and Rajesh Bindal postponed the hearing on the plea filed by Chouhan and two other BJP leaders, BJP state president V D Sharma and former minister Bhupendra Singh, to March 26.

Allegations Of Defamation

Tankha alleged that Chouhan, Sharma, and Singh orchestrated a “coordinated, malicious, false, and defamatory” campaign against him. The Congress leader claimed that the accusations were politically motivated and aimed at gaining electoral advantage. He further asserted that the BJP leaders falsely accused him of opposing the reservation for Other Backward Classes (OBC) during the 2021 Panchayat elections in Madhya Pradesh.

Legal Proceedings

The criminal defamation case was lodged as a result of these allegations. The trial court had initially summoned Chouhan and the other BJP leaders to appear in person.

However, Chouhan’s legal counsel moved the Supreme Court, seeking relief from mandatory personal appearances, citing his responsibilities as a Union Minister.

With the Supreme Court extending its exemption order, Chouhan will not be required to appear in person until the next hearing. The apex court’s decision to defer the hearing provides temporary relief to Chouhan and his co-accused while the case continues to unfold.

Political Repercussions

The defamation case has further intensified the political rivalry between the BJP and the Congress in Madhya Pradesh. While the BJP has dismissed the allegations as baseless, Congress leaders maintain that the accused should be held accountable for their statements.

As the matter is set to be taken up again on March 26, all eyes will be on the Supreme Court’s next course of action in this high-profile legal and political battle.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtInternational

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

“Wife’s Watching Porn, Self-Pleasure Not Cruelty”: Madras HC Turns Down Husband’s Divorce Plea

The Madras High Court rejected man's request for divorce, dismissing his claims that his wife’s…

6 hours ago

Delhi Riots Case: Delhi HC Lists Tasleem Ahmed’s Bail Plea Before Roster Bench

The Delhi High Court has scheduled the bail plea of Tasleem Ahmed for hearing before…

6 hours ago

Omar Abdullah Announces New Assembly, Salary Hike, Final Amnesty & Heritage Push For J&K

Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah made several significant announcements on Thursday during the…

6 hours ago

UP Court Issues Notice To Rahul Gandhi After Complaint Alleges His Words ‘Hurt Sentiments’

A local court in Sambhal has issued a notice to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, requiring…

7 hours ago

“Grabbing Minor’s Breasts, Breaking Pyjama Strings Doesn’t Qualify As Attempt To Rape”: Allahabad HC

A recent judgment by the Allahabad High Court has sparked a critical examination of India's…

7 hours ago

IPL 2025: Saliva Ban Lifted After BCCI Gets Captains’ Nod

The restriction on using saliva to shine the ball will be removed in the 2025…

9 hours ago