Supreme Court

“Delhi HC Seeks Govt’s Reply on PIL Against Use of Defense Officers for Political Propaganda

The Delhi High Court has sought the Centre’s response to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the utilization of Defence officers and Civil Servants to showcase the accomplishments of the ruling government over the past 9 years.
The petitioners, EAS Sarma and Jagdeep S Chhokar, are represented by Advocate Prashant Bhushan.
Chetan Sharma (Additional Advocate General for Delhi High Court) was granted time by the court to seek instructions in the matter, and the next hearing of the case is scheduled on January 5.
The petitioners contest an order issued by the Controller General of Defence Accounts, directing the deployment of defence officers at designated “selfie points” to highlight the positive initiatives of the Ministry of Defence.
Additionally, they challenge the Office Memorandum issued by the Department of Personnel and Training, which mandates the deployment of Joint Secretaries, Directors, and Deputy Secretaries as District Rath Prabharis to showcase the achievements of the Government of India over the past nine years.
Advocate Prashant Bhushan, representing the petitioners, argued that the use of Defence officers and civil servants is in violation of the rules governing the conduct of government servants and amounts to promoting the interests of a political party.
Advocate Prashant Bhushan stated, “Here you are seeking to use them for political propaganda. That falls foul of the rules and code of conduct for government servants. It would amount to corrupt practice under the Representation of Peoples Act.”
During the proceedings, Acting Chief Justice Manmohan made an oral remark, noting the prevalent ignorance in society and suggesting that individuals may become aware of certain schemes, such as pension schemes, through such promotional activities.
He observed, “Every newspaper today, when there is no election code in force, there are snaps of CMs or the Prime Minister on each advertisement.”

Ashish Sinha

-Ashish Kumar Sinha -Editor Legally Speaking -Ram Nath Goenka awardee - 14 Years of Experience in Media - Covering Courts Since 2008

Recent Posts

Wrestlers Sexual Harassment Case: Victim’s 8-Hour Cross-Examination Concludes

The Rouse Avenue court has recently completed the recording of a statement from one of…

9 mins ago

SC Forms SIT To Probe Animal Fat Claims In Tirupati Laddus

The Supreme Court on Friday has established an independent special investigation team to investigate allegations…

25 mins ago

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

18 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

18 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

18 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

19 hours ago