Supreme Court

Delhi Riots: SC Defers Bail Pleas Of Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, Gulfisha To Sep 19

The Supreme Court on Friday adjourned the bail pleas of activists Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, Gulfisha Fatima, Meeran Haider, and others in connection with the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act case linked to the February 2020 riots in Delhi.

The matter will now be heard on September 19, as the bench noted that the case files were received only recently.

A bench comprising Justices Aravind Kumar and N V Anjaria directed that the hearing be postponed, ensuring adequate time for examination of the petitions.

Background

The activists are challenging the Delhi High Court’s September 2 order, which denied bail to nine accused, including Khalid, Imam, Fatima, and others. The court had reasoned that violence disguised as protest could not be permitted, and that conspiratorial acts under the guise of dissent posed a serious threat to public order.

The accused facing bail denial include:

  • Umar Khalid
  • Sharjeel Imam
  • Gulfisha Fatima
  • Mohd Saleem Khan
  • Shifa Ur Rehman
  • Athar Khan
  • Meeran Haider
  • Abdul Khalid Saifi
  • Shadab Ahmed

Additionally, another accused, Tasleem Ahmed, had his bail plea rejected by a separate bench of the High Court on the same day.

Court’s Observations

The Delhi High Court acknowledged that the Constitution protects citizens’ rights to protest and express their views under Article 19(1)(a). However, the court emphasized that such rights are “not absolute” and must be exercised within lawful boundaries. It stated that while peaceful demonstrations are permitted, actions that disrupt law and order or incite violence can’t be condoned.

“If the exercise of an unfettered right to protest were permitted, it would damage the constitutional framework and impinge upon the law-and-order situation in the country,” the High Court’s order noted while rejecting bail.

UAPA Charges & Allegations

The accused have been booked under the UAPA and relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for allegedly orchestrating the riots in February 2020. The violence, which erupted during protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and National Register of Citizens (NRC), resulted in the deaths of 53 people and injuries to over 700 others.

The activists have denied all charges against them, asserting that they were peaceful participants in protests and that the allegations are politically motivated. They have been in judicial custody since 2020 and approached the High Court after their bail pleas were earlier rejected by a trial court.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtInternational

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago