Supreme Court

Dharmasthala Case: SC To Hear Plea Against K’taka HC Order Lifting Media Gag

The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear on Friday a plea challenging the Karnataka High Court’s recent decision to strike down a gag order on media coverage related to the controversial Dharmasthala mass burial case.

On August 1, the Karnataka High Court set aside an earlier interim order passed by a Bengaluru civil court that had restrained media outlets from reporting on developments in the case. The burial case has sparked wide public attention and online discourse, much of it centering around allegations involving the Dharmasthala temple and its management.

Temple Trust Moves SC Over Online Content

Appearing before a bench led by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud, an advocate for Harshendra Kumar D—Secretary of the Dharmasthala Temple trust—sought an urgent hearing, arguing that nearly 8,000 YouTube channels were circulating allegedly defamatory content about the temple.

“There are around 8,000 YouTube channels running defamatory material against the Dharmasthala temple,” the counsel submitted. The CJI responded, “I think it’s already listed for tomorrow.”

Kumar has approached the top court seeking removal of online content that he claims maligns the family managing the temple, including Dharamadhikari D Veerendra Heggade.

Earlier Gag Order Faced Legal Scrutiny

The media gag order originally stemmed from a defamation suit filed by Kumar. The Bengaluru court had directed over 390 media organisations to take down nearly 9,000 links and news stories related to the mass burial case in Dharmasthala, despite the absence of any direct FIRs against Kumar or the temple authorities.

One of the YouTube channels affected by the order, Third Eye, had earlier moved the Supreme Court against the sweeping directive. However, on July 23, the CJI-led bench declined to hear the petition, advising the petitioner to first approach the high court.

“You go to the high court first,” the CJI had remarked at that time.

Ongoing Probe & Political Reactions

The controversy revolves around allegations of the disappearance and suspected murder of multiple women in Dharmasthala, located in Karnataka’s Dakshina Kannada district. These claims, which have gone viral online, have drawn political attention as well.

Karnataka Home Minister G Parameshwara recently stated that conclusions should not be drawn prematurely and that a detailed investigation was necessary. The state government has since constituted a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe the allegations thoroughly.

As the matter returns to the Supreme Court, the legal and political implications surrounding the Dharmasthala case are expected to intensify.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtInternational

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago