Supreme Court

“Domestic Violence Act Applicable To Every Woman Irrespective Of Religious Affiliation”: SC

The Supreme Court on Thursday has affirmed that the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, constitutes a civil code applicable to all women in India, regardless of religious affiliation or social background.

A bench comprising Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Justice N. Kotiswar Singh emphasized that the Act serves to effectively protect the constitutional rights of women and to safeguard those subjected to domestic violence within a domestic relationship.

This ruling arose from an appeal by a woman contesting a Karnataka High Court decision regarding maintenance and compensation. In February 2015, a magistrate had granted her ₹12,000 per month in maintenance and ₹1 lakh in compensation under Section 12 of the Act.

The husband later appealed this decision; however, the appellate court dismissed his appeal on the grounds of delay. He subsequently filed an application under Section 25 of the Act, concerning the duration and modification of orders, but this was dismissed by the magistrate.

The husband then appealed again, and the appellate court remanded the case to the magistrate, directing that both parties be allowed to present evidence. The woman challenged this order in the high court, which dismissed her plea in April of the previous year, instructing the magistrate to consider the husband’s application under Section 25.

In its judgment, the Supreme Court noted that Section 25 permits an aggrieved party to seek alteration or revocation of orders made under the Act, contingent upon a change in circumstances as stipulated in subsection (2). The Court clarified that a magistrate must ascertain whether such a change has occurred to warrant an alteration, modification, or revocation.

The Court further explained that changes in circumstances could relate to financial aspects, such as changes in income, or other relevant factors that justify a modification of the maintenance amount. It highlighted that the provision encompasses considerations such as cost of living and income changes affecting either party.

However, the Court stipulated that any application of Section 25(2) must be based on changes that occur after the original order was made, thereby asserting that alterations operate prospectively rather than retrospectively.

Consequently, the husband could not retroactively seek a refund of any amounts already paid under the original order.

The Supreme Court set aside the decisions of the high court and the first appellate court, dismissing the husband’s application. It did, however, grant the husband the liberty to file a new application under Section 25 of the Act if he so chooses.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Rajasthan HC Quashes SC/ST Case Against Actress Shilpa Shetty

The Rajasthan High Court on Thursday quashed a complaint filed under the SC/ST (Prevention of…

19 hours ago

Allahabad HC Turns Down Appeal Seeking Appointment Of Receiver For Jaigurudev Sanstha

The Allahabad High Court on Thursday has dismissed an appeal filed by the Jaigurudev Dharma…

19 hours ago

Shivaji Statue Collapse Case: Bombay HC Grants Bail To Consultant Chetan Patil

The Bombay High Court granted bail to consultant Chetan Patil on Thursday in connection with…

20 hours ago

Excise Policy Case: Delhi HC Refuses To Stay Trial Against Arvind Kejriwal

The Delhi High Court on Thursday declined to stay the trial proceedings against former Delhi…

21 hours ago

AP Assembly Passes Resolution To Set Up HC Bench In Kurnool

The Andhra Pradesh Assembly on Thursday passed a resolution to establish a permanent High Court…

21 hours ago

Lesbian Couple Desiring Child Gets Bail In Kidnapping Of Minor Girl

The Bombay High Court on Thursday granted bail to a lesbian couple arrested for allegedly…

21 hours ago