Supreme Court

“DRI Officers Can Recover Duties On Imports”: Customs Dept. Tells SC

The Supreme Court on Wednesday reviewed a request from the customs department seeking to overturn a 2021 ruling that limited the authority of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence under the Customs Act.

The department argues that DRI officials should be allowed to recover duties on goods already cleared for import, contrary to the earlier judgment which held that DRI officers lacked this authority.

The 2021 verdict, delivered by a bench led by then Chief Justice SA Bobde, had ruled that DRI officials were not “proper officers” under the Customs Act and could not issue recovery notices for duties on imported goods. This decision had led to the quashing of DRI’s notices to companies, including M/S Canon India, demanding duty payments, interest, and penalties.

Additional Solicitor General N Venkataraman, representing the customs department, argued that the 2021 judgment contained errors and failed to consider key legal provisions. He emphasized that DRI officers are part of the customs framework and should be authorized to handle duty recovery. “A DRI officer today can be a customs official tomorrow,” he said.

The case has seen various legal developments. Initially decided by CJI Bobde’s bench, which ruled against the customs department, the matter involves whether DRI has the power to issue show cause notices for duties not levied or paid when goods were cleared by customs officers. The apex court had previously determined that an officer who did not make the original assessment should not be allowed to reopen it.

The current review plea is being heard by a bench led by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud. This follows a May 2022 decision by a bench headed by CJI N V Ramana to hear the customs department’s review plea in open court.

The 2021 judgment was challenged by M/S Canon India and other firms, arguing that their imports were exempt from customs duty under a 2012 notification, which amended earlier duty exemptions for digital cameras.

The hearing will continue on Thursday.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

SC Ruling Paves Way For Visually Impaired Judges; Yavnika Shares Her Experience

Supreme Court recently opened up the doors for visually impaired candidates in judiciary by striking…

1 day ago

Supreme Court To Hear Plea To Debar Poll Candidates Charged For Serious Offences On Mar 18

The Supreme Court is set to hear a plea on March 18 that seeks to…

1 day ago

Bombay HC Grants Pension Benefits To Former Judge Pushpa Ganediwala

The Bombay High Court has ruled in favor of former Additional Judge Pushpa Ganediwala, granting…

1 day ago

Bombay HC Sets Aside Complaint Against Kailash Kher For Hurting Religious Feelings

The Bombay High Court has dismissed a complaint against singer Kailash Kher, which alleged that…

1 day ago

Uttarakhand HC Stays Proposed Felling Of 3,300 Trees In Shivalik Elephant Reserve

The Uttarakhand High Court has put a temporary halt on the felling of 3,300 trees…

1 day ago

“Notify Posts For Special Education Teachers By March 28”: Supreme Court To States, UTs

The Supreme Court has directed all states and Union Territories to notify the sanctioned posts…

1 day ago