Supreme Court
The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to consider a request by the Tamil Nadu government to transfer its petition challenging recent Enforcement Directorate searches on TASMAC from the Madras High Court to a high court outside the state.
The case revolves around the ED’s raids on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation), the government-owned entity that controls liquor sales across the state. The raids, conducted as part of an ongoing investigation into alleged money laundering and financial irregularities, have drawn sharp reactions from the state government, which has accused central agencies of political targeting.
On March 25, a division bench of the Madras High Court, consisting of Justices M S Ramesh and N Senthilkumar, recused itself from hearing the petitions filed by TASMAC. The reasons for the recusal were not made public, but it led the state government to approach the Supreme Court, expressing concerns over whether a fair and impartial hearing could be ensured within the state.
The Tamil Nadu government has now filed a petition under Article 139A of the Constitution, which allows the Supreme Court to transfer cases from one high court to another. The plea argues that shifting the case outside Tamil Nadu is necessary to uphold the principles of natural justice and prevent any perception of bias or influence.
During Friday’s hearing, a bench led by Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna, along with Justices Sanjay Kumar and K V Viswanathan, heard senior advocate Vikram Chaudhari, who appeared on behalf of the Tamil Nadu government. Chaudhari urged the court to list the matter urgently, noting that the next hearing in the Madras High Court is approaching and a decision is needed before that.
Taking note of the submissions, the Supreme Court agreed to consider listing the case for an early hearing. While the court has not yet fixed a date, the matter is expected to come up soon.
The Enforcement Directorate had recently carried out searches at multiple TASMAC offices and other related premises as part of a probe into suspected violations of financial laws. The raids were reportedly based on intelligence inputs regarding irregularities in the procurement and sale of liquor, as well as possible links to money laundering.
The Tamil Nadu government has strongly opposed the ED’s actions, calling them politically motivated and an infringement on the state’s autonomy. The legal battle over the jurisdiction and fairness of the investigation is now poised to play out in the country’s top court.
This case is being closely watched, as it touches on broader issues of federalism, the role of central agencies in states, and the judiciary’s responsibility in ensuring impartial justice.
Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International
The Supreme Court on Wednesday voiced concern over recent outbreaks of violence linked to protests…
The Supreme Court of India on Wednesday stated that it will continue hearing pleas challenging…
A court in UP's Mau has issued a non-bailable warrant against Afsa Ansari, the wife…
The Karnataka High Court on Wednesday issued notices to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, his wife Parvathi…
The Karnataka High Court has raised serious concerns over the rising number of unauthorized medical…
Justice Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai is poised to take over as the 52nd Chief Justice of…