Supreme Court

EVM VVPAT JUDGEMENT STANDS RESERVED

In March 2023, the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) brought a significant case before the esteemed Supreme Court of India, advocating for the authentication of electronic voting machines (EVMs) with the implementation of voter-verifiable paper audit trails (VVPATs). The primary aim behind this initiative was to fortify the integrity and credibility of electoral processes across the nation. Central to the petitioners’ proposal was the suggestion to incorporate barcodes onto VVPAT slips, a measure intended to streamline and enhance the verification process.

During today’s proceedings, the Supreme Court panel diligently scrutinized the Election Commission, seeking elucidation before delivering its verdict. Justice Khanna, in particular, posed several pertinent queries to the Commission. He sought clarity on fundamental aspects such as the precise location of the microcontroller—whether it resided within the Control Unit or the VVPAT—and whether it possessed programmable capabilities. Additionally, Justice Khanna inquired about the availability and functionality of Symbol Loading Units, integral components of the electoral machinery. Another crucial aspect probed by the Justice was the maximum duration for which the machines ought to be retained, highlighting the importance of maintenance and preservation protocols.

Upon the conclusion of the day’s deliberations, the Supreme Court conveyed its stance, articulating a cautious yet proactive approach towards addressing the issues raised. The Court stated, “Let us see what can be done. If any safeguards are deemed necessary, we’ll evaluate what measures are requisite to strengthen the current electoral system.” This statement underscored the Court’s commitment to ensuring the robustness and reliability of electoral processes, while also acknowledging the need for potential enhancements.

As the proceedings drew to a close, the Supreme Court reserved its judgment, signifying a period of contemplation and deliberation before a final decision is rendered. This prudent approach reflects the gravity of the matter at hand and the Court’s steadfast dedication to upholding the democratic principles enshrined in the Constitution of India.

Hemansh Tandon

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago