Supreme Court

EVM VVPAT JUDGEMENT STANDS RESERVED

In March 2023, the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) brought a significant case before the esteemed Supreme Court of India, advocating for the authentication of electronic voting machines (EVMs) with the implementation of voter-verifiable paper audit trails (VVPATs). The primary aim behind this initiative was to fortify the integrity and credibility of electoral processes across the nation. Central to the petitioners’ proposal was the suggestion to incorporate barcodes onto VVPAT slips, a measure intended to streamline and enhance the verification process.

During today’s proceedings, the Supreme Court panel diligently scrutinized the Election Commission, seeking elucidation before delivering its verdict. Justice Khanna, in particular, posed several pertinent queries to the Commission. He sought clarity on fundamental aspects such as the precise location of the microcontroller—whether it resided within the Control Unit or the VVPAT—and whether it possessed programmable capabilities. Additionally, Justice Khanna inquired about the availability and functionality of Symbol Loading Units, integral components of the electoral machinery. Another crucial aspect probed by the Justice was the maximum duration for which the machines ought to be retained, highlighting the importance of maintenance and preservation protocols.

Upon the conclusion of the day’s deliberations, the Supreme Court conveyed its stance, articulating a cautious yet proactive approach towards addressing the issues raised. The Court stated, “Let us see what can be done. If any safeguards are deemed necessary, we’ll evaluate what measures are requisite to strengthen the current electoral system.” This statement underscored the Court’s commitment to ensuring the robustness and reliability of electoral processes, while also acknowledging the need for potential enhancements.

As the proceedings drew to a close, the Supreme Court reserved its judgment, signifying a period of contemplation and deliberation before a final decision is rendered. This prudent approach reflects the gravity of the matter at hand and the Court’s steadfast dedication to upholding the democratic principles enshrined in the Constitution of India.

Hemansh Tandon

Recent Posts

Supreme Court Says “Marriage Is Relationship Built On Mutual Trust, Companionship”

The Supreme Court has upheld a decision by the Madras High Court granting a divorce…

2 days ago

Delhi HC Grants Anticipatory Bail To Lawyer In Brother’s Criminal Case

The Delhi High Court has granted transit anticipatory bail to a lawyer whose brother is…

2 days ago

Justice Madan B Lokur Appointed As Chairperson of UN Internal Justice Council

Former Supreme Court Justice Madan B Lokur has been recently named the chairperson of the…

2 days ago

Karnataka High Court Directs NLSIU To Implement 0.5% Reservation For Transgender Persons

The Karnataka High Court has recently directed the National Law School of India University (NLSIU)…

2 days ago

Allahabad HC Directs UP Vigilance To Investigate Himalayan Cooperative Housing Land Issue

The Allahabad High Court has directed the Uttar Pradesh Vigilance Department to investigate the Himalayan…

2 days ago

Allahabad HC Grants Stay On Mohammed Zubair’s Arrest In Religious Enmity Case

The Allahabad High Court on Friday issued an order staying the arrest of Mohammed Zubair,…

2 days ago