Supreme Court

Gyanvapi: SC Refuses to Stop Puja in Vyasji Ka Tehkhana, Setback to  Masjid Committee

The Supreme Court has refused to stop ‘puja’ ceremonies at the ‘Vyas Tehkhana’ within the Gyanvapi Mosque, but directed that religious rituals performed by Hindus on the grounds of the mosque remain unchanged.

The mosque committee had approached the Supreme Court following the Allahabad High Court’s decision not to consider the Muslim side’s plea against the Varanasi District Court’s decision, which had allowed ‘puja’ in the ‘Vyas Tehkhana’ of the Gyanvapi Masjid.

A three-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice Manoj Mishra said it would be appropriate to issue notice on the mosque committee’s plea. The bench said that while the access to the ‘Tahkhana’ is from the southern side and the access to the mosque for offering ‘Namaz’ is from the northern side, it is appropriate to maintain the status quo as the ‘Namaz’ is being offered by the Muslims without any hindrance, And the ‘puja’ and rituals performed by Hindu priests are limited to ‘Vyasji’s basement’.

Senior lawyer Huzefa Ahmadi, representing the Anjuman Intezamia Masajid Committee, argued that the trial court and high court orders provide final relief in the interim stage. He expressed concern that the Gyanvapi Mosque was being gradually encroached upon and urged the apex court to stay the order.

The Hindu side was represented by senior advocate Shyam Diwan and advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain.

During the proceedings, Ahmadi highlighted that the state government, not a party to the case, immediately implemented the order, preventing his client from seeking a stay. He stressed that the ‘puja’ going on in the basement of the mosque complex is a cause for concern. The bench questioned the existence of two locks, to which Ahmadi replied that even though he was in possession, he did not take any action for 30 years, raising doubts on the basis of interim relief after such a long period.

Ashish Sinha

-Ashish Kumar Sinha -Editor Legally Speaking -Ram Nath Goenka awardee - 14 Years of Experience in Media - Covering Courts Since 2008

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

8 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

8 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

8 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

9 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

9 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

9 hours ago