Supreme Court

IUML-DYFI Challenges CAA Implementation: Seeking Stay on Citizenship Amendment Rules 2024

The day after the central government notified rules to implement the Citizenship Amendment Act 2019, the Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) and DYI have filed a petition seeking a stay on the Citizenship Amendment Rules 2024.

As the lead petitioner in a batch of writ petitions pending in the Supreme Court challenging the CAA, IUML filed an interim application in the ongoing writ petition seeking an immediate stay on the implementation of the CAA. The party termed the Act linking citizenship to religion as unconstitutional, arguing that the notion of constitutionality should not then apply.

Emphasizing that the Act had not come into force for 4.5 years, IUML argued that delaying its implementation until the Court’s final decision would prevent potential anomalies, especially considering citizenship granted under the Act was unconstitutional. If understood, it will probably be cancelled.

The IUML made its stand clear, opposing the religion-based exclusion of the Act and emphasizing its support for granting citizenship to migrants, which it considers contradictory with the constitutional concept of secularism.

In its application, IUML also requested the union to refrain from taking punitive action against persons excluded from the CAA on the basis of religion till the decision on the writ petition comes. Additionally, it sought relief for members of the Muslim community who were deprived of the opportunity to apply for citizenship under the rules.

The writ petitions were last listed before the Supreme Court on October 31, 2022.

The CAA, passed by Parliament in 2019, aims to expedite Indian citizenship for non-Muslim immigrants fleeing persecution in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan before December 31, 2014. However, its implementation was halted due to widespread protests, exacerbated by the proposed national register. of citizens (NRC) schemes.

The petitioners argue that the Act’s granting of Indian citizenship to religion-based persecuted people is contrary to the secular character of India. More than a hundred writ petitions challenging its constitutionality have been filed in the Supreme Court. However, while agreeing to hear the case, the Supreme Court had refused to stay the implementation of this law.

Responding to this petition, the government said that this Act does not affect the citizenship of any Indian citizen.

Recently, the Central Government notified rules to implement the CAA and committees have been constituted at the State/UT level to process applications under the Act.

Ashish Sinha

-Ashish Kumar Sinha -Editor Legally Speaking -Ram Nath Goenka awardee - 14 Years of Experience in Media - Covering Courts Since 2008

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago