Supreme Court

Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah Dispute: SC Lists Matter for Hearing on Jan 9

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Supreme Court on Friday scheduled the hearing on Shri Krishna Janambhoomi-Shahi Idgah land dispute for January 9, 2024.

A bench of Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia was hearing the matter.

The court said that it appears that the matter would have to be heard and asked both parties to file a short synopsis.

During the hearing, the court commented on the parties’ willingness to come to Delhi but reluctance to go to Allahabad, mentioning the distance between Mathura and Allahabad, raised by the mosque committee’s lawyer.

Earlier, the Supreme Court had sought details from the registrar of the Allahabad High Court regarding the suits related to the Mathura’s Krishna Janambhoomi land dispute being handled by the court.

The Committee of Management Trust Shahi Masjid Idgah has filed an appeal challenging the Allahabad High Court’s order. This order transferred all petitions concerning the Krishna Janambhoomi dispute from the District Court Mathura to the High Court.

The petition highlighted concerns regarding the transfer, mentioning that the proceedings in the originating suit were previously stayed by the High Court. The appeal emphasized that the transfer order bypassed the usual appellate stages and moved additional suits to the Allahabad High Court without corresponding transfer applications.

Multiple cases related to the Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi and Shahi Idgah Masjid have been filed in the Mathura Court. Among these, one suit filed by Ranjana Agnihotri from Lucknow sought ownership of 13.37 acres of land claimed by Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi and demanded the removal of the Shahi Idgah mosque situated at the birthplace of Lord Krishna. This suit contends the mosque’s construction in 1669-70 under the orders of Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb on the premises of the Katra Keshav Dev temple.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

“Wife’s Watching Porn, Self-Pleasure Not Cruelty”: Madras HC Turns Down Husband’s Divorce Plea

The Madras High Court rejected man's request for divorce, dismissing his claims that his wife’s…

13 hours ago

Delhi Riots Case: Delhi HC Lists Tasleem Ahmed’s Bail Plea Before Roster Bench

The Delhi High Court has scheduled the bail plea of Tasleem Ahmed for hearing before…

13 hours ago

Omar Abdullah Announces New Assembly, Salary Hike, Final Amnesty & Heritage Push For J&K

Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah made several significant announcements on Thursday during the…

14 hours ago

UP Court Issues Notice To Rahul Gandhi After Complaint Alleges His Words ‘Hurt Sentiments’

A local court in Sambhal has issued a notice to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, requiring…

14 hours ago

“Grabbing Minor’s Breasts, Breaking Pyjama Strings Doesn’t Qualify As Attempt To Rape”: Allahabad HC

A recent judgment by the Allahabad High Court has sparked a critical examination of India's…

14 hours ago

IPL 2025: Saliva Ban Lifted After BCCI Gets Captains’ Nod

The restriction on using saliva to shine the ball will be removed in the 2025…

16 hours ago