Supreme Court

Lady Justice Statue With The Eyes Open Matter: SCBA Objects To Changes

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

Following the unveiling of the statue of Lady Justice, which features her eyes open and the Constitution of India in one hand, the Supreme Court Bar Association on Thursday has voiced strong discontent over the alterations made to the statue without prior consultation.

The SCBA’s resolution highlights its objection to these modifications, as well as to the proposed museum in the Judges’ library.

In its statement, the Bar Association expressed its confusion over the rationale for these changes, emphasizing that it feels “clueless” about the motivations behind them. SCBA President Kapil Sibal specifically criticized the “unilateral” decisions made by the Supreme Court administration under Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud.

In a letter, the Executive Committee of the SCBA noted, “It is observed…that recently some radical changes have been brought in by the Supreme Court unilaterally, like the change of its emblem and the alteration of the statue of Lady Justice, without consultation with the Bar.”

The letter further emphasized that the legal community sees itself as an equal stakeholder in the administration of justice and feels sidelined by these developments.

The SCBA’s concerns reflect a broader sentiment within the legal community regarding the importance of collaborative decision-making, especially in matters that symbolize justice and the judiciary’s integrity. The changes to the statue, a significant emblem of legal authority, have sparked a debate about transparency and inclusion in the processes that shape the judiciary’s public image.

 Lady Justice Lady Justice

Lady JusticeLady Justice

The proposed museum in the Judges’ library has also raised eyebrows. Members of the Bar Association argue that such projects should be discussed openly with legal professionals to ensure that the history and values of the judiciary are appropriately represented.

As discussions continue, the SCBA is urging the Supreme Court administration to engage with its members more actively, fostering an environment of cooperation and mutual respect. The legal community is keen to ensure that its voice is heard, especially regarding changes that impact the representation of justice in India.

Overall, this situation serves as a reminder of the need for dialogue between the judiciary and the legal profession, ensuring that significant changes are approached with collective input and consensus.

The SCBA remains committed to advocating for its members and preserving the integrity of the justice system as a collaborative effort.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Kerala HC Refuses To Grant Relief To Lawyer Accused Of Raping Minor

The Kerala High Court has denied anticipatory bail to Noushad, a lawyer accused of sexually…

2 days ago

Supreme Court to Hear Petitions on Rohingya Refugees’ Deportation and Living Conditions on May 8

The Supreme Court has scheduled a hearing on May 8 for a set of petitions…

2 days ago

Advocates’ Association of Bengaluru to Address Judicial Corruption in Special Meeting

The Advocates' Association of Bengaluru (AAB) has called for a special general body meeting on…

2 days ago

Terror Funding Case: Delhi Court Junks Engineer Rashid’s Bail Plea

A Delhi court on Friday rejected the bail application of Lok Sabha MP from Jammu…

2 days ago

Bombay High Court Quashes Sexual Harassment Findings Against Bank Employee

The Bombay High Court has overturned an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) report and a subsequent…

3 days ago

Honey-Trap Scandal: Opposition BJP Members Stage Dharna In K’taka Legislative Assembly Seeking Judicial Probe

The members of the opposition BJP on Friday staged a protest in the Karnataka Legislative…

3 days ago