Supreme Court

Lawyer Files Complaint Against SP Leader SP Maurya Over Remarks on Hindu Religion

Supreme Court Advocate Vineet Jindal on Monday filed a complaint with the Delhi Police against Samajwadi Party leader Swami Prasad Maurya, citing his comments about the Hindu religion.

Advocate Jindal asserted that Maurya’s statements were not only provocative and defamatory, but also aimed at fostering hostility between religious groups, thereby constituting a cognizable offense.

Earlier today Swami Prasad posted a video on X (former Twitter) where he remarked, “The roots of Brahminism delve deep, and the very source of disparity lies within Brahminism itself. The term ‘Hindu’ holds no religious ground; it is merely a deceit. There exists no ‘Hindu’ religion.”

He went on to say, “There is a deliberate scheme to ensnare the Dalits, tribals, and marginalized populace of this nation by labeling the Brahmin faith as the ‘Hindu’ faith, when in reality it is the Brahmin belief. If indeed there were a ‘Hindu’ faith, it would have commanded reverence for tribals, Dalits, and marginalized communities. However, the irony is stark.”

In response to these remarks, Advocate Jindal lodged a complaint with the police, stating, “Our nation embraces secularism, upholding equality among all, irrespective of their caste, race, or religion. However, influential public figures bear the responsibility of influencing not just the current generation but also those to follow. Engaging in incendiary rhetoric, as Maurya has done, flagrantly disregards our nation’s secular fabric.”

“Maurya’s words take aim at the entire Hindu community, displaying a derogatory nature that fosters animosity among specific groups. The content of Maurya’s statement unmistakably reveals his intention to show disrespect toward the Hindu religion, thereby inciting resentment, insulting the faith, and sowing discord between various religious factions,” he added.

The advocate asked the Delhi Police to file a First Information Report (FIR) under Sections 153A and B, 295A, 298, and 505 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

“The accused, by making the aforementioned statement, has committed offenses under Sections 153A and B, 295A, 298, and 505 of the IPC, all of which are serious and cognizable offenses. A screenshot of Maurya’s statement, shared on his Twitter account, has been attached herewith. Therefore, I urge you to initiate an FIR against him under the aforementioned sections. I also appeal for the lodging of an FIR against him and the initiation of strict legal action,” the complaint stated.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Punjab & Haryana HC Notice To Jindal Law School Over AI-Generated Exam Claims

The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Tuesday has issued a notice to Jindal Global…

1 hour ago

ED Files Money Laundering Complaint Against Charanjit Singh Bajaj, 4 Others

The ED on Tuesday has filed a Prosecution Complaint before the Special Court in Mohali…

2 hours ago

Pune Porsche Case: SC Rejects Anticipatory Bail To Father Of Minor Driver’s Friend

The Supreme Court on Tuesday denied bail to Arunkumar Devnath Singh, whose son is a…

3 hours ago

SC Dumps Plea Against Quashing LOC For Sushant Singh Rajput’s Ex-House Help

The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed the Centre's appeal against a Bombay High Court order…

3 hours ago

Rape Case: SC Issues Notice On Ex-Army Officer’s Plea For Quashing Charge sheet

The Supreme Court on Tuesday has agreed to review a plea from retired Army Captain…

4 hours ago

Chhattisgarh NAN Scam: FIR Against 2 Retired IAS Officers, Former AG

The Chhattisgarh Anti-Corruption Bureau on Tuesday has registered a case against 2 retired IAS officers…

4 hours ago