Supreme Court

Manipur: ‘No Coercive Action Against Hyderabad University Professor for Two Weeks’, Says SC

The Supreme Court on Monday passed an ordered preventing any coercive measures from being taken against Hyderabad University professor Kham Khan Suan Hausing for a duration of two weeks.

This directive comes in response to two complaints filed against him in strife-torn Manipur.

One of the complaints alleges that Hausing intentionally engaged in acts intended to offend religious sentiments in Manipur, while the other pertains to alleged irregularities in his enrollment as a voter of the state.

A bench comprising Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud, Justices J B Pardiwala, and Manoj Misra has ruled that no coercive actions should be initiated against Hausing during this two-week period. This decision aims to provide Hausing the opportunity to approach the appropriate court for necessary remedies.

Hausing had sought protection from arrest through a plea presented before the bench. Anand Grover, a senior advocate representing the professor, highlighted that both cases had been lodged against his client. He emphasized that Hausing’s need for protection was to ensure that he could pursue the appropriate legal recourse.

In response, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing Manipur, argued that challenging a magistrate’s order directly before the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution was not permissible. Article 32 deals with the enforcement of fundamental rights. The magisterial court had issued summonses to Hausing in connection with one of the private complaints filed.

The bench noted that one criminal complaint against Hausing pertained to alleged offenses under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), such as Section 153-A (promotion of enmity between different groups based on religion, race, etc.) and Section 295-A (intentional and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings).

The court then specified that Hausing had the freedom to seek appropriate remedies, including anticipatory bail, from the relevant court.

It is pertinent to note that the Supreme Court is currently addressing a range of petitions related to the violence in Manipur. Recently, the court expressed concern over the severe atrocities endured by women in the state and underscored the need to address such grave issues. In response, a three-member committee of former high court judges has been entrusted with the task of investigating instances of violence against women in Manipur since May 4.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

14 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

14 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

14 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

15 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

15 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

15 hours ago