Supreme Court

Manipur: ‘No Coercive Action Against Hyderabad University Professor for Two Weeks’, Says SC

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Supreme Court on Monday passed an ordered preventing any coercive measures from being taken against Hyderabad University professor Kham Khan Suan Hausing for a duration of two weeks.

This directive comes in response to two complaints filed against him in strife-torn Manipur.

One of the complaints alleges that Hausing intentionally engaged in acts intended to offend religious sentiments in Manipur, while the other pertains to alleged irregularities in his enrollment as a voter of the state.

A bench comprising Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud, Justices J B Pardiwala, and Manoj Misra has ruled that no coercive actions should be initiated against Hausing during this two-week period. This decision aims to provide Hausing the opportunity to approach the appropriate court for necessary remedies.

Hausing had sought protection from arrest through a plea presented before the bench. Anand Grover, a senior advocate representing the professor, highlighted that both cases had been lodged against his client. He emphasized that Hausing’s need for protection was to ensure that he could pursue the appropriate legal recourse.

In response, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing Manipur, argued that challenging a magistrate’s order directly before the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution was not permissible. Article 32 deals with the enforcement of fundamental rights. The magisterial court had issued summonses to Hausing in connection with one of the private complaints filed.

The bench noted that one criminal complaint against Hausing pertained to alleged offenses under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), such as Section 153-A (promotion of enmity between different groups based on religion, race, etc.) and Section 295-A (intentional and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings).

The court then specified that Hausing had the freedom to seek appropriate remedies, including anticipatory bail, from the relevant court.

It is pertinent to note that the Supreme Court is currently addressing a range of petitions related to the violence in Manipur. Recently, the court expressed concern over the severe atrocities endured by women in the state and underscored the need to address such grave issues. In response, a three-member committee of former high court judges has been entrusted with the task of investigating instances of violence against women in Manipur since May 4.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Delhi Court Rejects BJP Leader’s Defamation Plea Against AAP’s Saurabh Bharadwaj

A Delhi court has dismissed a plea by BJP leader Suraj Bhan Chauhan seeking the…

10 hours ago

James Murray Accused Of Sending Inappropriate Messages To Minor

James Murray, one of the stars of the comedy series Impractical Jokers, is facing allegations…

10 hours ago

Mahatma Gandhi’s Great-Grandson Moves SC Against Sabarmati Ashram Redevelopment

Tushar Gandhi, the great-grandson of Mahatma Gandhi, has filed a petition in the Supreme Court…

11 hours ago

ITAT Grants Tax Exemption To Kapil Dev On ₹1.5 Crore BCCI Payment

In a significant ruling, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has recently granted tax exemption to…

12 hours ago

“Not Acceptable That Children Need To Wear Masks To Play Outside”: SC Judge Justice Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Judge Justice Vikram Nath on Saturday has raised concerns over the continued requirement…

13 hours ago

Government Criticizes ‘X’ Over Censorship Allegations In Karnataka HC

The Central government has strongly objected to claims of censorship made by Elon Musk-owned social…

13 hours ago