Supreme Court

Mathura Shahi Idgah Committee Reaches SC Against the Order of Allahabad High Court

The Shahi Idgah Committee of Mathura has filed a petition in the Supreme Court against the order of the Allahabad High Court. However, a caveat has already been filed in the Supreme Court by advocate Vishnu Shankar in this matter.

On May 26, the Allahabad High Court directed the District Judge of Mathura to prepare a list of all such cases of a similar nature, including the subject matter and touching its purview, whether expressly or by implication, including such cases and these Include details of suit-cases. High Court had said The record, as mentioned above, shall be duly forwarded to the Court and the same shall be transferred to this Court in exercise of suo motu powers of this Court.

The transfer petition in Allahabad was filed by Vishnu Shankar Jain-Hari Shankar Jain and was represented by Advocates Prabhash Pandey and Pradeep Kumar Sharma. He emphasized the importance of the pending cases for lakhs of Lord Krishna devotees and argued that the matter was of national importance.

Hence, he requested to transfer the cases to the High Court. Advocates Hari Shankar Jain and Vishnu Shankar Jain further submitted that the High Court is well equipped to handle the important legal questions and constitutional interpretations involved in the litigation pending before the Mathura Court.

Following the arguments, a single judge bench of Justice Arvind Kumar Mishra of the High Court referred to Section 24(1)(b) of the CPC, which allows for the withdrawal of a pending trial from a subordinate court and transfer to the court where The transfer was done. An application has been made to the High Court in this matter.

It clarified that the High Court has jurisdiction to hear and decide all issues covered under Section 24 of the CPC, overcoming any limitation that may prevent the High Court from proceeding with a case after withdrawing it from a civil court where it was initially filed. Thus, the Court asserted its power to transfer cases pending before lower courts.

In fact, the Hindu side claims that Aurangzeb had demolished the temple and built a mosque there. In 1670, an order was issued to demolish the temple of Bhagwan Keshavdev in Mathura. After this, the Shahi Idgah mosque was built in Mathura. Total ownership of 13.37 land in Mathura. There is a dispute regarding the right, in fact Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi has ownership rights of about 10.9 acres and Shahi Idgah has ownership rights over two and a half acres. Not only this, the Hindu side is demanding the removal of the Shahi Idgah mosque and handing over the land to Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi.

Ashish Sinha

-Ashish Kumar Sinha -Editor Legally Speaking -Ram Nath Goenka awardee - 14 Years of Experience in Media - Covering Courts Since 2008

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago