Supreme Court

Muzaffarnagar Slapping Case: SC Directs UP Govt to Secure Sponsorship for Victim Student

The Supreme Court has directed the Uttar Pradesh (UP) government to find a sponsor to cover the educational expenses of the Muslim child from Muzaffarnagar who was slapped by his classmates, allegedly at their teacher’s behest

A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Augustine George Masih emphasized that the State must ensure the child continues in the same school.

“The child’s education expenses should be taken care of until the end of his schooling. You have to get a sponsor and ensure he continues in the same school,” the Court stated.

The state government has been given two weeks to file a compliance affidavit.

The Court was hearing a plea filed by Tushar Gandhi, the great-grandson of Mahatma Gandhi, seeking action against a school teacher named Tripta Tyagi for allegedly inciting students to slap a Muslim student. Tyagi is said to have made derogatory remarks about the Muslim student’s religion and instigated classmates to beat him, as seen in a viral video.

The incident caused public outrage after the video spread on social media. The school where the incident occurred was subsequently sealed. The teacher later released a video denying any communal intent but acknowledged her mistake.

Tushar Gandhi’s plea sought a time-bound, independent probe into the matter and measures to address violence against religious minority students.

In October 2023, the Uttar Pradesh government informed the Supreme Court that the teacher might face charges under Section 295A (deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

In February this year, the Supreme Court strongly criticized the Uttar Pradesh government for its inadequate response, particularly its failure to provide counseling to the children allegedly made to slap their classmate. The Court had previously taken issue with how the Uttar Pradesh Police omitted key allegations in the initial first information report (FIR) filed in the case.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago