Supreme Court

NGT Files Suo Motu Case Over Luxury Hotel Construction Near Kaziranga National Park

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has initiated a suo motu case regarding the construction of luxury hotels in and around Kaziranga National Park (KNP) in Assam.

The Principal Bench of the NGT, based in New Delhi, registered the case under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, following media reports on the matter.

According to its official website, the tribunal has not yet scheduled a date for the case hearing.

This development comes shortly after the Assam government signed an agreement with the Tata Group to build a five-star hotel near the UNESCO World Heritage site. The UNESCO website describes KNP as one of the last areas in eastern India relatively undisturbed by human presence, home to the world’s largest population of one-horned rhinoceroses, as well as tigers, elephants, panthers, bears, and thousands of birds.

On Saturday (August 3), the Assam Tourism Development Corporation (ATDC) signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Amalgamated Plantations Pvt Ltd (APPL) and Indian Hotels Company Ltd (IHCL), both subsidiaries of the Tata Group, to develop the luxury property at a cost of Rs 120 crore. The MoU includes plans for a resort and spa near the core area of the National Park.

Additionally, an international hotel chain, Hyatt, is also developing a five-star hotel near the KNP. On September 23 of the previous year, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma announced that the ATDC would soon sign an agreement with the Hyatt Group to create a 5-star resort with 100-120 rooms, investing Rs 100 crore next to the KNP.

In July, the Greater Kaziranga Land and Human Rights Protection Committee alleged that a significant portion of land near the park has been “illegally” converted and handed over to the multinational hospitality group for constructing a five-star hotel without adhering to due regulations.

The committee claimed that the process violated several norms, including the lack of a public hearing with the affected 45 families and the absence of Environmental Impact Assessment and Social Impact Assessment.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Kerala HC Refuses To Grant Relief To Lawyer Accused Of Raping Minor

The Kerala High Court has denied anticipatory bail to Noushad, a lawyer accused of sexually…

23 hours ago

Supreme Court to Hear Petitions on Rohingya Refugees’ Deportation and Living Conditions on May 8

The Supreme Court has scheduled a hearing on May 8 for a set of petitions…

1 day ago

Advocates’ Association of Bengaluru to Address Judicial Corruption in Special Meeting

The Advocates' Association of Bengaluru (AAB) has called for a special general body meeting on…

1 day ago

Terror Funding Case: Delhi Court Junks Engineer Rashid’s Bail Plea

A Delhi court on Friday rejected the bail application of Lok Sabha MP from Jammu…

2 days ago

Bombay High Court Quashes Sexual Harassment Findings Against Bank Employee

The Bombay High Court has overturned an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) report and a subsequent…

2 days ago

Honey-Trap Scandal: Opposition BJP Members Stage Dharna In K’taka Legislative Assembly Seeking Judicial Probe

The members of the opposition BJP on Friday staged a protest in the Karnataka Legislative…

2 days ago