Supreme Court

NGT Files Suo Motu Case Over Luxury Hotel Construction Near Kaziranga National Park

The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has initiated a suo motu case regarding the construction of luxury hotels in and around Kaziranga National Park (KNP) in Assam.

The Principal Bench of the NGT, based in New Delhi, registered the case under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, following media reports on the matter.

According to its official website, the tribunal has not yet scheduled a date for the case hearing.

This development comes shortly after the Assam government signed an agreement with the Tata Group to build a five-star hotel near the UNESCO World Heritage site. The UNESCO website describes KNP as one of the last areas in eastern India relatively undisturbed by human presence, home to the world’s largest population of one-horned rhinoceroses, as well as tigers, elephants, panthers, bears, and thousands of birds.

On Saturday (August 3), the Assam Tourism Development Corporation (ATDC) signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Amalgamated Plantations Pvt Ltd (APPL) and Indian Hotels Company Ltd (IHCL), both subsidiaries of the Tata Group, to develop the luxury property at a cost of Rs 120 crore. The MoU includes plans for a resort and spa near the core area of the National Park.

Additionally, an international hotel chain, Hyatt, is also developing a five-star hotel near the KNP. On September 23 of the previous year, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma announced that the ATDC would soon sign an agreement with the Hyatt Group to create a 5-star resort with 100-120 rooms, investing Rs 100 crore next to the KNP.

In July, the Greater Kaziranga Land and Human Rights Protection Committee alleged that a significant portion of land near the park has been “illegally” converted and handed over to the multinational hospitality group for constructing a five-star hotel without adhering to due regulations.

The committee claimed that the process violated several norms, including the lack of a public hearing with the affected 45 families and the absence of Environmental Impact Assessment and Social Impact Assessment.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Air Pollution: SC To Consider Extending Colour-Coded Sticker Rule For Vehicles Nationwide

The Supreme Court has reinforced the critical need for hologram-based, colour-coded stickers on vehicles to…

4 hours ago

Minor Rape Murder Case: Kalyan Court Remands Accused Couple In 14-Day Judicial Custody

A court in Thane district, Maharashtra, has remanded a couple in judicial custody until January…

6 hours ago

“Social Media Users Under 18 To Require Parental Consent”: Digital Personal Data Protection Act

The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) has released the draft rules for the…

7 hours ago

TV Actor Shweta Tiwari Withdraws Plea In Bombay HC After Police Close Forgery Probe

Television actor Shweta Tiwari recently withdrew her petition before the Bombay High Court seeking to…

7 hours ago

Delhi HC Turns Down FIR Against Doctor In Foetus Gender Disclosure Case

The Delhi High Court recently quashed an FIR against a doctor accused of revealing a…

8 hours ago

“CBI Doesn’t Need State Consent To File FIR”: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has recently said that the CBI does not require the permission of…

9 hours ago