No one Can Impose his Religion to Others, SC Dismisses PIL with 1 Lakh Cost

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a plea which sought to decalre spiritual leader Sri Sri Thakur Anukulchandra as ‘Paramatma’, and imposed Rs 1 lakh cost on the petitioner.

A bench comprising justices M.R. Shah and C.T. Ravikumar said that in India, everyone has the full right to follow their religion as India is a secular country.

The petitioner made Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP), Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), National Christian Council, Ramakrishna Math, Gurdwara Bangla Sahib, Sri Palanpuri Sthanakvasi Jain Association, Buddhist Society of India etc. parties in the case.

The bench told the petitioner Upendra Nath Dalai, who appeared in-person, “You can’t say everyone has to follow only one religion.”

Terming the petition as ‘publicity interest litigation’, the bench added, “If you want, you can consider him as ‘Paramatma. Why enforce it on others?”

The bench told the petitioner how it is possible that all citizens of the country should accept “your ‘guruji'”. It added that in India, everyone has the right to follow their religion.

Declining to entertain the plea, the bench said the petition is “thoroughly misconceived” which deserves to be dismissed with exemplary cost of Rs 1 lakh. The bench added that this cost has to be deposited with its registry within four weeks from today.

Concluding the hearing, the top court said, “Now people will think at least four times before filing such PILs.”(51)

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare
Legally Speaking Desk

Recent Posts

SC Upholds Disqualification Of Himachal Pradesh Pradhan For Concealing Criminal Case

The Supreme Court has upheld the Himachal Pradesh High Court's decision that candidates contesting panchayat…

9 hours ago

Delhi Court To Hear Satyender Jain’s Defamation Case; Confirms Jurisdiction

The Delhi's Rouse Avenue Court on Saturday has ruled that it has jurisdiction to proceed…

9 hours ago

Copyright Case: Delhi HC Directs A R Rahman, Ponniyin Selvan 2 Makers To Deposit Rs 2 cr

The Delhi High Court has determined that “Veera Raja Veera,” featured in the film Ponniyin…

9 hours ago

Road Rage Case: Karnataka HC Obstructs IAF Officer From Police Action

The Karnataka High Court has barred Bengaluru police from arresting Indian Air Force (IAF) Wing…

9 hours ago

Defamation Case: Pune Court Summons Rahul Gandhi Over His Remarks On Savarkar

A Pune court has called Congress leader Rahul Gandhi to appear on May 9 in…

10 hours ago

Madras HC Restores 2 Disproportionate Assets Cases Against Minister Panneerselvam

The Madras High Court has revived two disproportionate assets (DA) cases against DMK leader and…

10 hours ago