Supreme Court

Plea In SC Challenging Delhi Police Prohibitory Order On Restriction Over Assembly Of 5 Or More People

A plea has been filed in the Supreme Court challenging a prohibitory order issued by the Delhi Police, which bans assemblies of 5 or more people from September 30 to October 5.

The petitioner argues that this order will negatively impact attendance during the Dussehra and Navratri festivals.

Sunil, a priest at the Kalkaji Temple and Secretary of the Manas Naman Sewa Society, which organizes the grand Ramlila at Satpula Ground in Chirag, Delhi, submitted the plea through advocate Prateek Chadha. He contends that the order will obstruct religious celebrations during this important time.

The petition states, “The Ramlila and associated fairs draw significant crowds each year during Dussehra and Navratri, which are scheduled to start on October 3, 2024. This order jeopardizes these long-standing traditions for no constitutionally valid reason.”

The plea emphasizes that the Navratri festival, beginning October 3, will be adversely affected by the assembly ban in notified areas including New Delhi, North Delhi, Central Delhi, and border regions of the NCT.

The petitioner seeks to quash the order dated September 30, 2024, issued by the Commissioner of Police, which invokes Section 163 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

This order prohibits the assembly of five or more unauthorized persons and restricts carrying firearms, banners, and placards, as well as holding protests in public areas.

“The impugned order will significantly hinder citizens wishing to enter the NCT of Delhi from other states,” the petition claims. The reasons given for the order do not indicate any emergency or unforeseen circumstances that would justify such restrictions.

The petitioner argues that the upcoming elections, amendments to Waqf laws, and festivals are all well-known events, and appropriate security arrangements should have been made. Invoking Section 163 for these foreseeable situations, without a grave threat to public order, is deemed unsustainable based on previous court rulings.

The petition further suggests that instead of maintaining law and order, the police are attempting to evade their responsibilities by prohibiting legitimate gatherings typical in a diverse metropolis like Delhi. It asserts that the Delhi Police’s decision severely disrupts the daily lives and fundamental rights of citizens.

In response, AAP minister Saurabh Bharadwaj criticized the Delhi Police and the lieutenant governor for issuing an “impractical order” just ahead of the festive season.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

4 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

4 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

4 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

5 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

5 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

5 hours ago