Quality Of Witness That Matters, Not Quantity: SC Stated While Upholding A Murder Conviction

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld the conviction and life sentence of four murder suspects based on the testimony of the case’s lone eyewitness.

A division bench of Justice BR Gavai and Justice Vikram Nath while hearing a petition filed by murder accused Ajai Alias Ajju (and others) observed that it is not the quantity of witnesses to a criminal trial that matter but the quality of witnesses.

Therefore, the Court rejected the accused’s claim that the prosecution failed to examine two witnesses in the case.

“It is the discretion of the prosecution to lead as much evidence as is necessary for proving the charge. It is not the quantity of the witnesses but the quality of witnesses which matters,” the bench added.

The case involves the murder of Pinky Anand’s family members in 2007. The accused were close relatives and neighbours who were said to harbour animosity towards Anand’s father.

The convicts were accused of killing the family in order to obtain property and settle a score. However, Pinky and her sister Rashmi escaped the tragic occurrence, albeit with injuries.

A trial court convicted all four men charged in the case of murder and unlawful assembly, among other charges under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Arms Act of 1959.

They were given the death penalty.

The Allahabad High Court upheld the conviction but commuted the death sentence for all four accused to life imprisonment.

The four accused filed an appeal with the Supreme Court after being dissatisfied with the High Court’s decision.

The accused contended before the Supreme Court that the entire case was based on the testimony of a single witness (Pinky Anand), whose testimony was untrustworthy because she was related to the deceased and also had animosity towards the accused.

Furthermore, it was argued that there was no other evidence to back up her testimony.

The Court further noted that the police was informed of the actual events as soon as the statement of the sisters were later taken in the hospital.

The Court concluded that Pinky Anand “was a fully reliable witness and has said the events in natural course.”

As a result, it proceeded to uphold the four accused’s murder convictions.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Shahi Idgah Dispute: Allahabad HC Seeks Muslim Side Response On Plea

The Allahabad High Court, on Wednesday, sought a response from the Muslim side concerning a…

14 hours ago

Corbett Illegal Construction: SC Raps U’khand For Acting Against Top Officers At ‘Snail’s Pace’

The Supreme Court of India on Wednesday expressed strong disapproval of the Uttarakhand government's "snail's…

15 hours ago

Delhi High Court Stays BFI’s March 7 Circular On Election Representation

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday temporarily stayed the Boxing Federation of India's March 7…

15 hours ago

Migrant Workers’ Case: SC Raises Concerns Over Ration Card Misuse, Warns They Have Turned Into ‘Popularity Cards’

Ration cards are now being used as 'popularity cards,' said Justice Surya Kant, in an…

16 hours ago

“F-1 Visa: How Students Can Stay Compliant & Avoid Deportation”

The Trump administration's recent escalation of immigration enforcement, particularly targeting foreign nationals associated with pro-Palestinian…

16 hours ago

Delhi HC Seeks Centre Response After PIL Demands Closure Of Abattoirs Near IGI Airport

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday sought a response from the Central government regarding a…

17 hours ago