Raise Quota Of Judicial Officers In HC Judges’ Appointment To 50% : JSAD Filed Petition In SC

The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought responses from the Union Law Ministry and the Delhi High Court in response to a petition seeking to increase the judicial officers ratio to 50% in the appointment of High Court judges.

A bench of Justices BR Gavai and Vikram Nath issued the notice while hearing an intervention application in the All India Judges Association case.

Currently, judicial officers are appointed to one-third of the HC posts, with the remaining two-thirds filled by members elevated from the bar.

Senior Advocate Rakesh Khanna, along with advocates Sachin Jain and Ajay Kumar Agarwal, represented the applicants, the Judicial Service Association of Delhi, at the hearing on February 7.

According to the application filed by the Judicial Service Association of Delhi, which is based on Article 217 (2) of the Indian Constitution, there are two avenues for elevation as High Court Judges. The first source is someone who has been a judge for at least ten years, and the second source is someone who has been an advocate for at least ten years. These two sources are independent and distinct.

In fact, the applicant pointed out that the first clause of Article 217(2) of the Constitution is about the removal of judicial officers from service. Only the second clause is concerned with elevating advocates from the bar. It argued that the first choice for elevation as a high court judge should be from among the judicial officers.

Furthermore, these appointees to the high court from the subordinate judiciary have been under the constant supervision and guidance of the respective High Court, and their performance has been tested over time, the plea stated.

Aside from that, a judicial officer with many years of experience on the Bench is already a recluse with no political ideology. As a result, the quota open to the District Judiciary in the High Court can be increased to 50% in order to improve the institution and instill citizen confidence in the judiciary.

As a result, the applicant urged the Court to issue orders ensuring that the bar-service ratios are at least maintained in the appointment of High Court Judges, and that vacancies from the service quota are filled as soon as possible.

The matter will be next heard on February 28.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

14 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

14 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

14 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

15 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

15 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

15 hours ago