The Supreme Court on Tuesday granted bail to human rights activist Gautam Navlakha in the Elgar Parishad-Maoist links case.
Justices M M Sundresh and S V N Bhatti declined to extend the stay imposed by the Bombay High Court order on Navlakha’s bail in the case.
The bench also instructed Navlakha to pay Rs 20 lakh towards expenses for security during his house arrest.
“We are inclined not to extend the stay as the high court order is detailed in granting bail. The trial would take years and years for completion. Without delving into contentions at length, we will not extend the stay. A sum of Rs 20 lakh is to be paid to the opposite party at the earliest,” the bench stated.
The apex court observed that Navlakha has been in jail for over four years and charges are yet to be framed in the case.
On December, 2023, the Bombay High Court had granted bail to Navlakha but stayed its order for three weeks after the National Investigation Agency (NIA) sought time to file an appeal in the Supreme Court.
Gautam Navlakha, detained in August 2018, had been permitted by the Supreme Court in November last year to be placed under house arrest. Presently residing in Navi Mumbai, the activist’s situation revolves around alleged inflammatory speeches during the Elgar Parishad conclave in Pune on December 31, 2017. Authorities claim these speeches incited violence near the Koregaon-Bhima war memorial on the outskirts of Pune the following day.
In connection with this case, 16 activists have faced arrests, with five of them currently out on bail.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Tuesday has issued a notice to Jindal Global…
The ED on Tuesday has filed a Prosecution Complaint before the Special Court in Mohali…
The Supreme Court on Tuesday denied bail to Arunkumar Devnath Singh, whose son is a…
The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed the Centre's appeal against a Bombay High Court order…
The Supreme Court on Tuesday has agreed to review a plea from retired Army Captain…
The Chhattisgarh Anti-Corruption Bureau on Tuesday has registered a case against 2 retired IAS officers…