Supreme Court

Religious Conversion: SC Stays Criminal Proceedings against Christian Missionary

The Supreme Court on Friday stayed the criminal proceedings pending in a Madhya Pradesh trial court against Christian missionary Ajai Lall.

The case involves alleged forced conversion of two foster children and their parents to Christianity.

Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, along with Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, passed the stay order, effective until the matter is finally disposed of by the Supreme Court.

During the hearing, CJI questioned the applicability of the offence of human trafficking (Section 370 of the Indian Penal Code), noting the absence of such an allegation in the case. The petitioner is facing charges under Sections 370 and 186 of the IPC, along with S. 3 and 5 of the M.P. Dharmik Swantrata Adhiniyam, 2021 (M.P. Act, 2021), and S. 42 and 74 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015. The petitioner has challenged the MP High Court’s decision to not quash the case.

The criminal case originated from a complaint by the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) following a viral video in which a woman claimed that she, her husband, and children were coerced to convert to Christianity in exchange for money. The petitioner allegedly harassed them when they stopped attending church.

Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, representing the petitioner, highlighted that despite the State’s undertaking not to pursue the trial until January 5, 2024, the trial court continued the proceedings. Sibal argued for the transfer of the trial to another court.

Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta, representing the State, agreed with Sibal, stating that the trial judge should not have proceeded despite the State’s commitment. Mehta assured the Supreme Court that the State would inform the trial judge not to proceed until the Supreme Court decides the matter.

The CJI, referring to a previous order, clarified that the State had committed to not pursuing the trial until January 5, 2024. Sibal pointed out that the trial court misinterpreted the Supreme Court’s order, leading to confusion. The SG explained that the misinterpretation arose from the petitioner’s claim that the Supreme Court had stayed the proceedings.

To eliminate further confusion, the CJI ordered a stay on the trial, emphasizing that the trial judge was under a misapprehension regarding the true intent of the Supreme Court’s order.

In the concluding part of the hearing, the CJI questioned the basis for a charge of human trafficking under Section 370 of the IPC, stating that it was not the ex facie allegation. The SG responded that there are other contentions to address and emphasized the seriousness of dealing with children in this matter.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Gulmarg Fashion Show: Srinagar Court To Hear Case Against Organizers On April 8

A Srinagar court has scheduled a hearing for April 8, 2025, in connection with the…

2 days ago

Gold Smuggling Case: Kannada Actress Ranya Rao Moves Sessions Court For Bail

Kannada actress Ranya Rao, arrested last week in connection with a gold smuggling case, has…

2 days ago

“Advocates Can appear In Confiscation Proceedings Under Forest Act”: MP High Court

The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled that advocates can represent clients in confiscation cases under…

2 days ago

Cement Prices Are Likely To Increase Because Of New Mineral Tax By States: Report

Cement prices across various states are expected to increase following a Supreme Court ruling that…

2 days ago

“Plaint Against Teacher By Parent, Student: First Enquiry, Then Arrest”: Kerala HC

The Kerala High Court has laid down new guidelines to protect educators from hasty arrests…

2 days ago

SC Ruling Paves Way For Visually Impaired Judges; Yavnika Shares Her Experience

Supreme Court recently opened up the doors for visually impaired candidates in judiciary by striking…

4 days ago