Supreme Court

Same-Sex Marriage: Justice Sanjiv Khanna Recuses from Hearing Review Pleas

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Supreme Court judge, Justice Sanjiv Khanna recused himself from hearing review petitions challenging the apex court’s decision last year to deny legal recognition to same-sex marriage, sources revealed. Justice Khanna cited personal reasons for his recusal.

Justice Khanna’s recusal will require CJI D Y Chandrachud to reconstitute a new five-judge constitution bench to consider the review pleas.

On 9th July, the Apex Court had declined an open court hearing for the pleas seeking a review of last year’s judgment.

In a significant setback for gay rights activists, a five-judge constitution bench led by Chandrachud had, on October 17 of the previous year, denied legal recognition to same-sex marriage, stating that there was “no unqualified right” to marriage except for those recognized by law.

However, the apex court strongly advocated for the rights of queer individuals to ensure they do not face discrimination in accessing goods and services available to others. It also called for the establishment of ‘Garima Greh’ (safe houses) in all districts to provide shelter for community members facing harassment and violence, and the creation of dedicated hotline numbers for emergencies.

A five-judge bench comprising CJI Chandrachud along with justices Sanjiv Khanna, Hima Kohli, B V Nagarathna, and P S Narasimha, was set to review the judgment in chambers. According to practice, review pleas are considered in chambers by judges.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, Other Courts, International

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare
AddThis Website Tools
Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

SC Upholds Disqualification Of Himachal Pradesh Pradhan For Concealing Criminal Case

The Supreme Court has upheld the Himachal Pradesh High Court's decision that candidates contesting panchayat…

1 day ago

Delhi Court To Hear Satyender Jain’s Defamation Case; Confirms Jurisdiction

The Delhi's Rouse Avenue Court on Saturday has ruled that it has jurisdiction to proceed…

1 day ago

Copyright Case: Delhi HC Directs A R Rahman, Ponniyin Selvan 2 Makers To Deposit Rs 2 cr

The Delhi High Court has determined that “Veera Raja Veera,” featured in the film Ponniyin…

1 day ago

Road Rage Case: Karnataka HC Obstructs IAF Officer From Police Action

The Karnataka High Court has barred Bengaluru police from arresting Indian Air Force (IAF) Wing…

1 day ago

Defamation Case: Pune Court Summons Rahul Gandhi Over His Remarks On Savarkar

A Pune court has called Congress leader Rahul Gandhi to appear on May 9 in…

1 day ago

Madras HC Restores 2 Disproportionate Assets Cases Against Minister Panneerselvam

The Madras High Court has revived two disproportionate assets (DA) cases against DMK leader and…

1 day ago