Supreme Court

SC Adjourns Hearing on Pleas Challenging ED’s Powers under PMLA

The Supreme Court on Thursday adjourned the hearing on pleas seeking reconsideration of its July 27, 2022 verdict, which upheld the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) powers under the PMLA to arrest and attach property.

A bench comprising Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, and Bela M Trivedi, deferred the hearing by eight weeks after Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, requested time to address the petitioners’ arguments in detail.

The bench permitted the petitioner’s side to amend its application, incorporating various ‘new aspects,’ and directed the Centre to file its reply within four weeks.

The apex court specified that the rejoinder to the Centre’s reply should be filed within four weeks thereafter.

The bench acknowledged that the deferment would leave limited time for drafting the order and noted that the Chief Justice of India would need to reconstitute the bench due to Justice Kaul’s impending retirement on December 25. Solicitor General Mehta, after arguments by senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Abhishek Singhvi for the petitioners, sought time to present his submissions, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive review of the PMLA.

The court clarified that its scope was limited to determining whether the 2022 verdict required reconsideration by a larger five-judge bench.

The Centre defended the PMLA as essential legislation, while the petitioners argued that the ED had become uncontrollable. The bench considered pleas seeking a review of the July 27, 2022 verdict, citing specific parameters for reconsideration.

In August 2022, the court had agreed to review the verdict and highlighted two aspects—non-provision of an Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) and the reversal of the presumption of innocence—that required reconsideration.

The 2022 verdict affirmed the validity of certain PMLA provisions, emphasizing that it was not an ordinary offense. The court upheld the ED’s powers for arrest, property attachment, and search and seizure under the PMLA.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Karnataka HC Notices CM On Plea To Transfer MUDA Case To CBI

The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday has issued a notice to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and…

36 mins ago

Delhi HC Dismisses PIL For Councillors’ Fund Increase, Advises Raising Of Issue In MCD House

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday dismissed a Public Interest Litigation filed by MCD Councillor…

53 mins ago

“States Can’t Seize All Private Properties For Common Good”: SC

In a landmark 7:2 ruling on Tuesday, the Supreme Court declared that states do not…

1 hour ago

“Judicial Independence Isn’t Just Delivering Anti-Government Verdicts”: CJI DY Chandrachud

Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud has recently emphasized that judicial independence doesn't equate to consistently ruling…

2 hours ago

SC Upholds Validity Of UP Board Of Madarsa Education Act

The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld the constitutional validity of the Uttar Pradesh Board of…

2 hours ago

North-East Delhi Violence Case: HC Dismisses Khalid Saifi’s Plea

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday has dismissed Khalid Saifi's plea challenging a trial court's…

2 hours ago