Supreme Court

SC Declines Urgent Listing Of Plea Against Imperative Registration Of Waqfs Under UMEED Portal

The Supreme Court on Friday refused to urgently list an interim application challenging the mandatory registration of all waqfs, including those classified as “waqf-by-user,” under the recently launched UMEED portal.

On June 6, the Centre rolled out the Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development (UMEED) Central Portal. The initiative aims to create a comprehensive digital inventory of waqf properties across the country by geo-tagging and uploading details of all registered assets.

Under the mandate, waqf boards must upload property details on the portal within six months.

Court Had Reserved Orders Earlier

A bench led by Chief Justice B R Gavai reminded counsel that interim orders in the larger waqf matter had already been reserved. The court had earlier heard arguments and reserved its order on May 22 on three critical questions:

The power to denotify properties classified as waqf through court rulings, user claims, or deeds under the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025.

The composition and functioning of state waqf boards and the Central Waqf Council.

A provision allowing collectors to determine if a waqf property is actually government land, which would exclude it from being treated as waqf.

Lawyers Flag Practical Issues

On Friday, a lawyer informed the bench that the UMEED portal now makes registration mandatory for all categories of waqf properties, including waqf-by-users, but said such properties are often difficult to formally register.

“We sought to file an interim application for directions, but the (apex court) registry is not allowing it saying that the judgment is already reserved,” the lawyer said.

Chief Justice Gavai responded, “We have already reserved the order in the matter.”

When the counsel pointed out the urgency due to the six-month deadline, the CJI remarked, “You register it… nobody is refusing you the registration,” indicating the issue could be taken up later.

Centre Defends The Law

The Centre has strongly backed the amendments, arguing that waqf is a secular concept and the legislation enjoys a presumption of constitutionality. It has urged the court not to stall the implementation of the portal or other provisions of the Act.

With the orders already reserved, the court is expected to rule on key aspects of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, including the scope of registration, powers of denotification, and oversight mechanisms. Until then, the registration requirement under UMEED remains in force.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtInternational

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago