Supreme Court

SC Delivers Split Verdict on Pleas against Environment Release of GM Mustard

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Supreme Court on Tuesday delivered a split verdict on the validity of the Centre’s 2022 decisions regarding the environmental release of the mustard hybrid Dhara Mustard Hybrid-11 (DMH-11) for seed production and testing.

A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and Sanjay Karol heard pleas challenging the October 18, 2022, decision of the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC), the country’s regulator for genetically modified organisms-recommending environmental release and the subsequent decision on October 25 approving the environmental release of transgenic mustard hybrid DMH-11.

After hearing the pleas, the bench rendered a divergent opinion. The matter has been referred to Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud for adjudication by the appropriate bench.

However, both judges unanimously directed the Centre to formulate a national policy on genetically modified (GM) crops. The bench instructed the environment ministry to undertake a consultation process with all stakeholders and experts, preferably within four months, before formulating a national policy on GM crops.

Regarding the environmental release of GM crops, Justice Nagarathna stated that the October 18 and 25, 2022, decisions of the GEAC were vitiated due to the absence of a member from the health department and the absence of eight members in total. In contrast, Justice Karol asserted that the GEAC decisions do not suffer from any manifest arbitrariness and are not vitiated. He added that field trials of the environmental release of GM Mustard must be conducted with strict safeguards.

The top court’s verdict came in response to separate pleas by activist Aruna Rodrigues and NGO ‘Gene Campaign,’ which sought a moratorium on the release of any genetically modified organisms (GMOs) into the environment pending a comprehensive, transparent, and rigorous biosafety protocol in the public domain conducted by independent expert bodies.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

SC Allows Jharkhand To Cut Power On Ram Navami Routes To Prevent Electrocution

The Supreme Court on Friday allowed the Jharkhand government and its power distribution company to…

41 minutes ago

Delhi HC Bar Honours Justice DK Sharma As He Moves To Calcutta HC

Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma recently bid farewell to the Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA)…

1 hour ago

“No To Plea For Barring Kids Below 13 From Using Social Media: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Friday declined to entertain a public interest litigation seeking a ban…

2 hours ago

IOA Moves Delhi HC Against Order Rejecting Ad-hoc Panel For Bihar Olympic Association

The Indian Olympic Association on friday filed an appeal in the Delhi High Court, challenging…

2 hours ago

SC Turns Down Production Of Yasin Malik Before Jammu Court; Orders Cross-Examination From Tihar Jail

In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India on Friday directed separatist leader Yasin…

3 hours ago

‘ED Searches On TASMAC’: SC To List Plea Of TN Seeking Transfer Of Its Plea From Madras HC

The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to consider a request by the Tamil Nadu government…

4 hours ago