Supreme Court

SC Directs Status Quo on Archakas’ Transfer in Tamil Nadu Agama Temples

 

The Supreme Court has directed the Tamil Nadu government to maintain the status quo regarding the transfer of Archakas (temple priests) in Agama temples within the state.

A bench of Justices AS Bopanna and MM Sundresh has ordered that this status quo be upheld until further orders and has adjourned the matter for three weeks.

The Apex Court had previously sought the response of the Tamil Nadu government on August 25 regarding this issue. The case was brought to the court’s attention by a temple trust, which also raised concerns about the terms governing the appointment of ‘fit persons’ or executive officers to manage these temples in the absence of elected trustees. These guidelines were established in an August 2021 ruling by the Madras High Court.

The High Court had ruled that the appointment of Archakas in Agama temples should be governed by the Agamas themselves rather than the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious Institutions Employees (Conditions of Service) Rules, 2020. The High Court also stated that Archakas should only be transferred from one temple to another if both temples follow the same Agama traditions.

Regarding the appointment of ‘fit persons’ or executive officers, the High Court held that such appointments should only occur under specific circumstances. While the right to appoint Archakas lies with the trustees, in the absence of trustees or for reasons outlined in Section 49 of the 1959 Act, a ‘fit person’ can be appointed to fulfill the duties of trusteeship.

The temple trust has challenged this High Court order in the Supreme Court, arguing that the terms of Archakas’ transfers need to be adjusted due to the unique customs and practices of each temple. Additionally, there is concern that if executive officers or fit persons are appointed, they may occupy these positions for extended periods without taking steps to appoint trustees.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

10 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

10 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

10 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

11 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

11 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

11 hours ago