The Supreme Court on Monday directs the maintenance of status quo regarding the demolition drive in Sonapur, Assam, following a contempt petition filed by over 40 residents alleging violations of a prior court order.
The bench, comprising Justices BR Gavai and KV Viswanathan, issued a notice to the Assam Government and local authorities regarding the allegations.
The petitioners claimed that local authorities initiated an eviction drive in Kachutoli village despite the Supreme Court’s interim order dated September 17, 2024, which mandated that no demolition should occur nationwide without prior permission.
The petitioners sought to initiate contempt proceedings, asserting that the actions of the authorities amounted to a deliberate and willful violation of the court’s directive.
During the hearing, Senior Advocate Huzefa Ahmadi represented the petitioners, emphasizing the need for immediate action against the alleged contempt. The bench confirmed that the parties should maintain the current status until further notice.
The petitioners stated that authorities flagged their homes with red stickers without providing any notice regarding eviction or demolition. They have resided in the affected areas for decades, holding a power of attorney from the original landowners, despite not having formal ownership rights.
The petitioners also referenced a Gauhati High Court order from September 20, 2024, wherein the Advocate General assured that no actions would be taken against them until their representations were addressed according to the Supreme Court’s February 3, 2020, order.
Highlighting their long-standing presence in the area and the peaceful coexistence with local communities, the petitioners argued that they were being wrongfully targeted as illegal occupiers.
They stated that they have occupied the land with the consent of the actual landowners and that there has been no proper demarcation of the tribal belt areas.
The Supreme Court has scheduled further hearings in this matter, aiming to ensure adherence to its previous orders and the protection of residents’ rights.
