Supreme Court

Supreme Court Disapproves Centre’s condition for additional borrowing Consent for Kerala

The Supreme Court, on Wednesday disapproved Union Government’s requirement for the State of Kerala to withdraw its suit filed in the Supreme Court as a condition for granting additional borrowing consent. The bench, comprising Justices Surya Kant and KV Viswanathan, was hearing Kerala’s suit against the Union under Article 131 of the Constitution, challenging borrowing limits imposed by the Union.

During the hearing, the bench expressed dissatisfaction with the Union’s stance, questioning the validity of such a condition. It emphasized that while other conditions could be considered within constitutional parameters, the demand for withdrawal of the suit was unwarranted.

Addressing the Attorney General for India R Venkataramani and Additional Solicitor General N Venkataraman, Justice Surya Kant emphasized the importance of not imposing a condition that infringes upon the litigant’s constitutional right to file a suit.

Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, representing Kerala, highlighted the urgency of the financial crisis faced by the State, urging for additional borrowing beyond the offered amount of Rs 13,608 crores.

The bench instructed both parties to hold discussions to resolve the issues, excluding the condition of withdrawing the suit. It acknowledged the need for a thorough examination of the constitutional issues raised in the suit, indicating that this case marks a precedent in its nature.

The suit revolves around the interpretation of Article 293 of the Constitution and the fiscal autonomy of states regarding borrowing. Kerala argues that its unique economic circumstances necessitate borrowing without Union consent to meet essential needs like education and health services.

The bench committed to a comprehensive examination of the issues raised, recognizing the gravity of the situation and its implications on the economy.

Ashish Sinha

-Ashish Kumar Sinha -Editor Legally Speaking -Ram Nath Goenka awardee - 14 Years of Experience in Media - Covering Courts Since 2008

Recent Posts

Punjab & Haryana HC Notice To Jindal Law School Over AI-Generated Exam Claims

The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Tuesday has issued a notice to Jindal Global…

9 hours ago

ED Files Money Laundering Complaint Against Charanjit Singh Bajaj, 4 Others

The ED on Tuesday has filed a Prosecution Complaint before the Special Court in Mohali…

9 hours ago

Pune Porsche Case: SC Rejects Anticipatory Bail To Father Of Minor Driver’s Friend

The Supreme Court on Tuesday denied bail to Arunkumar Devnath Singh, whose son is a…

11 hours ago

SC Dumps Plea Against Quashing LOC For Sushant Singh Rajput’s Ex-House Help

The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed the Centre's appeal against a Bombay High Court order…

11 hours ago

Rape Case: SC Issues Notice On Ex-Army Officer’s Plea For Quashing Charge sheet

The Supreme Court on Tuesday has agreed to review a plea from retired Army Captain…

11 hours ago

Chhattisgarh NAN Scam: FIR Against 2 Retired IAS Officers, Former AG

The Chhattisgarh Anti-Corruption Bureau on Tuesday has registered a case against 2 retired IAS officers…

12 hours ago