Categories: NationalSupreme Court

SC Dismiss A Plea Seeking Review To Its Verdict upholding Abdullah Azam disqualification For UP Legislator

The Supreme Court recently dismissed a petition filed by Rampur MLA Mohd. Abdullah Azam, the son of Samajwadi Party leader and MP, Azam Khan, seeking review of its November 7 decision upholding the former legislator’s disqualification for not having reached the minimum qualifying age on the election date.

A division bench of Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice B.V. Nagarathna, rejecting both the application for permitting an open court hearing, and for reviewing the earlier judgement of 2022 that pronounced Abdullah as disqualified to be chosen to fill the seat in the legislature.

The top court had in November upheld a decision of the Allahabad High Court to disqualify Rampur MLA Mohd. Abdullah Khan for not having attained the age of 25 years on the date of the election as prescribed in Article 173 (b) of the Constitution.

The case pertains to 2019, when the Allahabad High Court struck a major blow to Khan’s electoral aspirations when the petitioner, Nawab Khan moved the Court claiming that the young politician from the Samajwadi Party (SP) had falsely represented himself to be older for the purpose of contesting the assembly elections.

In response to this decision, Abdullah Azam had approached the Supreme Court, which, after an extended hearing, decided in favour of the original petitioner, Nawab Khan.

The appellant, Mohd. Abdullah Azam on a Samajwadi Party ticket, ran for the 2017 Uttar Pradesh Assembly Elections from the Swar constituency in Rampur and won.

However, in December 2019, an Allahabad High Court single-judge bench invalidated his membership in the State Legislature on the grounds that he was under 25 years old when he filed his nomination, on the date that the nomination paper was scrutinised, and on the date that the results were announced.

Holding that Abdullah Azam was not qualified to be chosen to fill the seat in the legislature of the State in terms of Article 173 (b) of the Constitution, Justice Surya Prakash allowed the election petition.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago