Categories: NationalSupreme Court

SC Dismiss A Plea Seeking Review To Its Verdict upholding Abdullah Azam disqualification For UP Legislator

The Supreme Court recently dismissed a petition filed by Rampur MLA Mohd. Abdullah Azam, the son of Samajwadi Party leader and MP, Azam Khan, seeking review of its November 7 decision upholding the former legislator’s disqualification for not having reached the minimum qualifying age on the election date.

A division bench of Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice B.V. Nagarathna, rejecting both the application for permitting an open court hearing, and for reviewing the earlier judgement of 2022 that pronounced Abdullah as disqualified to be chosen to fill the seat in the legislature.

The top court had in November upheld a decision of the Allahabad High Court to disqualify Rampur MLA Mohd. Abdullah Khan for not having attained the age of 25 years on the date of the election as prescribed in Article 173 (b) of the Constitution.

The case pertains to 2019, when the Allahabad High Court struck a major blow to Khan’s electoral aspirations when the petitioner, Nawab Khan moved the Court claiming that the young politician from the Samajwadi Party (SP) had falsely represented himself to be older for the purpose of contesting the assembly elections.

In response to this decision, Abdullah Azam had approached the Supreme Court, which, after an extended hearing, decided in favour of the original petitioner, Nawab Khan.

The appellant, Mohd. Abdullah Azam on a Samajwadi Party ticket, ran for the 2017 Uttar Pradesh Assembly Elections from the Swar constituency in Rampur and won.

However, in December 2019, an Allahabad High Court single-judge bench invalidated his membership in the State Legislature on the grounds that he was under 25 years old when he filed his nomination, on the date that the nomination paper was scrutinised, and on the date that the results were announced.

Holding that Abdullah Azam was not qualified to be chosen to fill the seat in the legislature of the State in terms of Article 173 (b) of the Constitution, Justice Surya Prakash allowed the election petition.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Centre Opposes Ex-Judges Panel To Monitor Stubble Burning In SC

The Centre on Friday opposed a proposal in the Supreme Court to form a committee…

4 hours ago

“It’s A Celebration For Us”: Delhi HC Bar Association Felicitates CJI Sanjiv Khanna

The Delhi High Court Bar Association on Friday honored Chief Justice of India Justice Sanjiv…

4 hours ago

International Criminal Court Issues Arrest Warrant For Israeli PM Netanyahu

The International Criminal Court has recently issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,…

5 hours ago

Cal HC Stays Demolition Of Illegal Constructions In WB’s Mandarmoni

The Calcutta High Court on Friday granted an interim stay on the demolition of alleged…

5 hours ago

SC To Pass Order On Pleas To Efface Words ‘Secular’, ‘Socialist’ From Preamble

The Supreme Court on Friday announced that it would deliver its order on November 25…

6 hours ago

Air Pollution: SC Questions Delhi Govt On Truck Entry Amid GRAP-4 Restrictions

The Supreme Court raised concerns on Friday about the "drastic" consequences of the GRAP Stage…

6 hours ago