Supreme Court

SC Dismisses Plea Of Conman Sukesh Chandrashekhar & His Wife Seeking More Time To Meet With Lawyers

The Supreme Court on Tuesday denied a writ petition filed by alleged conman Sukesh Chandrashekhar and wife Leena Paulose seeking an extension in the visitation time given by jail authorities to meet family, friends, and legal representatives.

A Bench comprised of Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice Bela M Trivedi dismissed the petition, noting that the accused persons were not in a position to seek such “privileges” and make such an “extraordinary demands.”

The Counsel appearing on behalf of the two accused persons informed the Bench that his clients are allowed to see and communicate with family members, relatives, friends, and legal advisors as per the prison rules. However, he said that they are only permitted to use the facility for 30 minutes twice a week. He requested an extension of the time limit, claiming his difficulty.

He claimed that there are 28 cases pending against the accused around the country, with more than ten lawyers involved, and that the visitation time given by the jail rules is insufficient. It was asserted that this violates the right to legal representation guaranteed by Article 22(1) of the Indian Constitution.

The Bench rejected the contention that accused persons can make such exceptional demands.

“Give a list of the lawyers. We will ask the jail officials detain them in the prison itself. Instead of meeting him every day, let the lawyers stay with him inside,” An enraged Justice Rastogi told the Counsel.

The apex court had ordered to transfer Sukesh and his wife Leena Paulose to Mandoli Jail from Tihar Jail last year, after they complained of harassment and intimidation from Tihar jail officials.

However, the Court denied his request to be transferred to a jail outside of the Delhi-NCR. Later that year, in October, the Court dismissed another petition he filed seeking transfer from Mandoli to a jail outside the Delhi-NCR.

Isha Das

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

10 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

10 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

10 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

11 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

11 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

11 hours ago