Categories: Supreme Court

SC Gives Benefit of Doubt to Accused in 35 years Old Murder Case

                   
The Supreme Court on Wednesday has given the benefit of the doubt to two men facing proceedings over the last 35 years in a 1985 murder case.
  
The Top court also set aside a trial court decision dated January 29, 1986, and Allahabad High Court judgement dated July 9, 2014.

A bench of justices S Ravindra Bhat and Dipankar Datta in its order said that “This Court is of the opinion that the charge that the petitioners had murdered Narayan, cannot be said to have been proved beyond a reasonable doubt; hence, they were and are entitled to the benefit of the doubt,” the bench added.
The Bench also added that
“The trial court’s judgment of conviction and order of sentence contained in its decision dated 29th January 1986 being unsustainable, stands set aside; consequently, the impugned judgment and order dated 9th July 2014 passed by the High Court, upholding the conviction and sentence, to stands set aside,”.

Additional Sessions Judge, Shahjahanpur, Uttar Pradesh, on January 29 1986, convicted
two men Munna and Sheo Lal for murder and Allahabad High Court also confirmed on July 9, 2014. Thesec Two men moved the Supreme Court against the Allahabad High Court Judgement.
  
On September 5, 1985, Narayan, the father of Ram Vilas, was murdered in a village in the district of Shahjahanpur in Uttar Pradesh. After that a written complaint was lodged soon thereafter by Ram Vilas leading to the registration of an FIR under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Munna Lal, Sheo Lal, Babu Ram, and Kalika were accused of committing murder. After investigation a charge sheet was filed under IPC section 302 before the concerned court against each of the four accused. Accused Kalika and Babu Ram both had passed away during the pendency of the matter.
   

SC gives benefit of doubt to accused in 35 years old murder case
                   
The Supreme Court on Wednesday has given the benefit of the doubt to two men facing proceedings over the last 35 years in a 1985 murder case.
  
The Top court also set aside a trial court decision dated January 29, 1986, and Allahabad High Court judgement dated July 9, 2014.

A bench of justices S Ravindra Bhat and Dipankar Datta in its order said that “This Court is of the opinion that the charge that the petitioners had murdered Narayan, cannot be said to have been proved beyond a reasonable doubt; hence, they were and are entitled to the benefit of the doubt,” the bench added.
The Bench also added that
“The trial court’s judgment of conviction and order of sentence contained in its decision dated 29th January 1986 being unsustainable, stands set aside; consequently, the impugned judgment and order dated 9th July 2014 passed by the High Court, upholding the conviction and sentence, to stands set aside,”.

Additional Sessions Judge, Shahjahanpur, Uttar Pradesh, on January 29 1986, convicted
two men Munna and Sheo Lal for murder and Allahabad High Court also confirmed on July 9, 2014. Thesec Two men moved the Supreme Court against the Allahabad High Court Judgement.
  
On September 5, 1985, Narayan, the father of Ram Vilas, was murdered in a village in the district of Shahjahanpur in Uttar Pradesh. After that a written complaint was lodged soon thereafter by Ram Vilas leading to the registration of an FIR under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Munna Lal, Sheo Lal, Babu Ram, and Kalika were accused of committing murder. After investigation a charge sheet was filed under IPC section 302 before the concerned court against each of the four accused. Accused Kalika and Babu Ram both had passed away during the pendency of the matter.
   

Ashish Sinha

-Ashish Kumar Sinha -Editor Legally Speaking -Ram Nath Goenka awardee - 14 Years of Experience in Media - Covering Courts Since 2008

Recent Posts

Delhi HC Bars Non-Advocates From Representing Litigants In Consumer Courts

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday has strongly objected to the practice of non-advocates and…

5 minutes ago

Delhi HC Mandates Free Medical Care For Rape, Acid Attack, Sexual Assault, POCSO Victims

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday directed that survivors of rape, acid attacks, sexual assaults,…

57 minutes ago

Congress Challenges Election Rules Amendment In Supreme Court

A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court challenging the recent amendments to the…

1 hour ago

Delhi HC Rejects To Intervene In Order For Revision In CLAT-2025 Result

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday declined to intervene in a ruling that directed the…

2 hours ago

“Unsafe, Shoddy Signature View Flats”: Delhi HC Slams DDA; Allows Demolition

The Delhi High Court on Monday sharply criticized the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) for its…

4 hours ago

Supreme Court Rebukes Registry For Failing To List Cases Despite Judicial Orders

The Supreme Court recently criticized its registry for failing to list cases as directed by…

4 hours ago