Supreme Court

SC Highlights Gender Bias Against Women Leaders In Panchayats

The Supreme Court of India on Thursday expressed strong disapproval of the widespread gender discrimination faced by elected female representatives, particularly at the Panchayat level.

The Court’s remarks came while examining the case of a female Sarpanch (village head) who was unfairly ousted from her position due to alleged delays in development projects.

A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan noted that this case is part of a broader and systemic issue of prejudice and discrimination against female Sarpanches.

The Court highlighted that the removal of women from positions of power, especially in rural and remote areas, is often treated as a casual matter, with democratic processes and principles of natural justice being ignored.

The justices emphasized that this entrenched bias demands urgent reform and introspection.

The Court criticized the normalization of such gender bias, stressing that it is particularly concerning in a nation striving to become an economic powerhouse. The justices urged administrative authorities, who hold considerable power, to lead by example and actively promote women’s empowerment, rather than adopting regressive attitudes that undermine female leadership in governance.

The case involved Sonam Lakra, a 27-year-old woman who had been elected as the Sarpanch of Sajbahar Gram Panchayat. Despite being entrusted with several development projects, including road construction, she was blamed for delays and removed from office in January 2024.

The woman challenged her removal, but the High Court denied her relief. She then approached the Supreme Court.

Previously on November 14, the Supreme Court ordered her reinstatement, awarded her ₹1 lakh in compensation for the harassment she faced, and concluded that she had been unfairly targeted.

The Court found that the removal proceedings against her were initiated on flimsy pretexts and criticized the treatment of elected representatives as subordinate to bureaucrats, which undermines their democratic legitimacy.

The judgment called for a reevaluation of the current system, urging that elected representatives should not be treated as civil servants but as leaders with genuine democratic authority.

Advocates Manish Kumar Gupta, Lave Kumar Sharma, and Sharadprakash Pandey represented the appellant, while Deputy Advocate General Vikrant Singh Bais, along with several other lawyers, appeared for the State of Chhattisgarh.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Air Pollution: SC To Consider Extending Colour-Coded Sticker Rule For Vehicles Nationwide

The Supreme Court has reinforced the critical need for hologram-based, colour-coded stickers on vehicles to…

1 day ago

Minor Rape Murder Case: Kalyan Court Remands Accused Couple In 14-Day Judicial Custody

A court in Thane district, Maharashtra, has remanded a couple in judicial custody until January…

1 day ago

“Social Media Users Under 18 To Require Parental Consent”: Digital Personal Data Protection Act

The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) has released the draft rules for the…

2 days ago

TV Actor Shweta Tiwari Withdraws Plea In Bombay HC After Police Close Forgery Probe

Television actor Shweta Tiwari recently withdrew her petition before the Bombay High Court seeking to…

2 days ago

Delhi HC Turns Down FIR Against Doctor In Foetus Gender Disclosure Case

The Delhi High Court recently quashed an FIR against a doctor accused of revealing a…

2 days ago

“CBI Doesn’t Need State Consent To File FIR”: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has recently said that the CBI does not require the permission of…

2 days ago