Supreme Court

SC Issues Notice In Challenge To West Bengal Taxes On Entry Of Goods Act

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Supreme Court has agreed to examine the constitutional validity of the West Bengal Taxes on Entry of Goods into the Local Areas Act, 2012, as amended by the West Bengal Finance Act, 2017.

A bench comprising Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan has issued a notice returnable on April 22, 2025, in response to multiple petitions challenging the Act.

The court has also granted interim relief to the petitioners, directing that no coercive action be taken against them until the next hearing.

Background Of The Case

Several companies, including Samsung India, had initially challenged the Act before the West Bengal High Court, arguing that the state lacked the authority to impose entry tax on goods meant for export outside India. In 2013, a Single Judge Bench ruled in favor of the companies, striking down the law on the grounds that it was not a compensatory tax and violated Articles 309 and 304(a) of the Constitution.

However, the West Bengal government appealed, and the division bench put the Single Judge’s order on hold. Meanwhile, after the introduction of Goods and Services Tax (GST) through the 101st Constitutional Amendment in 2016, the state amended the Entry Tax Act retrospectively through the Finance Act, 2017, giving it legal backing.

In a later ruling, the division bench upheld the tax, prompting the petitioners to approach the Supreme Court.

Arguments From Both Sides

The petitioners, represented by Senior Advocates Arvind P. Datar, Balbir Singh, Shyam Divan, and Kavin Gulati, argue that the 101st Constitutional Amendment did not grant the state the legislative power to validate the retrospective amendments.

On the other hand, Senior Advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, appearing for the West Bengal government, cited the Supreme Court’s ruling in State of Telangana v. Tirumala Constructions and the landmark 9-judge bench decision in Jindal Stainless Ltd. v. State of Haryana.

In Tirumala Constructions, the Supreme Court had interpreted Section 19 of the 101st Amendment, which allowed existing tax laws to continue, be amended, or repealed during the transition to GST. The West Bengal government argues that this provision gives the state the authority to modify the Entry Tax Act.

Court will now hear the matter and decide whether West Bengal’s retrospective amendments to the Entry Tax Act were legally valid. The next hearing is scheduled for April 22, 2025.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtInternational

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

“Will Maintain Decency In Shows”: Podcaster Ranveer Allahbadia In Undertaking To SC

Podcaster Ranveer Allahbadia, popularly known as BeerBiceps, filed an undertaking in the Supreme Court on…

13 hours ago

Gold Smuggling Case: Actress Ranya Rao Seeks Bail From Karnataka HC

Kannada actress Ranya Rao on Tuesday filed a bail petition in the Karnataka High Court…

13 hours ago

SC Declines To Entertain Mahua Moitra’s Plea Seeking Transparency In Financial Markets

The Supreme Court on Tuesday has directed Trinamool Congress (TMC) Member of Parliament Mahua Moitra…

13 hours ago

Ex-Ruler’s Heirs Move Delhi HC Over Rent For Bikaner House

The heirs of late Maharaja Dr. Karni Singh filed an appeal in the Delhi High…

14 hours ago

Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration’s Freeze On Federal Funding

The federal judge on Tuesday blocked the Trump administration’s attempt to freeze federal funding, delivering…

14 hours ago

Sexual Assault Case: Bombay HC Denies Bail To School Bus Driver

The Bombay High Court has denied bail to a school bus driver who was arrested…

15 hours ago