Supreme Court

SC Issues Notice To Centre, ECI On Plea To Declare ‘Freebies’ As Bribe

The Supreme Court has recently issued a notice to the Centre and the Election Commission of India regarding a plea that seeks to classify promises of freebies made by political parties during election campaigns as bribes.

A bench led by Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud has tagged this petition alongside other pending cases for consideration.

The plea, filed by Karnataka resident Shashank J. Shreedhara, calls for the Election Commission to implement immediate measures to prohibit political parties from making such promises in the lead-up to elections.

Through advocates Vishwaditya Sharma and Balaji Srinivasan, the petition argues that unregulated promises of freebies impose significant financial burdens on taxpayers and that there is no mechanism in place to ensure that these pre-election commitments are fulfilled.

The petition asserts that promises of freebies especially in cash made by political parties during Assembly or General elections, which are to be funded from public resources if the party comes to power, should be regarded as a corrupt practice under the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

It highlights that parties frequently announce these freebies without disclosing their funding sources, leading to a lack of transparency.

This opacity often results in unfulfilled promises, which the petitioner claims constitutes fraud on the electorate. The plea further argues that such practices create an uneven electoral landscape, where voters are swayed not by candidates’ policies or governance records but by the prospect of immediate benefits.

Consequently, this reduces the electoral process to a transactional one, where votes are effectively bought through future rewards.

The petition underscores that despite the increasing prevalence of these pre-poll promises, the Election Commission has failed to take adequate action to address the issue.

It emphasizes that the Commission, as the guardian of free and fair elections, has a constitutional obligation to prevent unethical practices and ensure that elections maintain the integrity of democracy.

As the Supreme Court considers this matter, the outcome may have significant implications for how political parties campaign and the ethical standards governing electoral promises in India.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Gulmarg Fashion Show: Srinagar Court To Hear Case Against Organizers On April 8

A Srinagar court has scheduled a hearing for April 8, 2025, in connection with the…

1 day ago

Gold Smuggling Case: Kannada Actress Ranya Rao Moves Sessions Court For Bail

Kannada actress Ranya Rao, arrested last week in connection with a gold smuggling case, has…

1 day ago

“Advocates Can appear In Confiscation Proceedings Under Forest Act”: MP High Court

The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled that advocates can represent clients in confiscation cases under…

1 day ago

Cement Prices Are Likely To Increase Because Of New Mineral Tax By States: Report

Cement prices across various states are expected to increase following a Supreme Court ruling that…

1 day ago

“Plaint Against Teacher By Parent, Student: First Enquiry, Then Arrest”: Kerala HC

The Kerala High Court has laid down new guidelines to protect educators from hasty arrests…

2 days ago

SC Ruling Paves Way For Visually Impaired Judges; Yavnika Shares Her Experience

Supreme Court recently opened up the doors for visually impaired candidates in judiciary by striking…

3 days ago