Supreme Court

SC Issues Notice To Centre, ECI On Plea To Declare ‘Freebies’ As Bribe

The Supreme Court has recently issued a notice to the Centre and the Election Commission of India regarding a plea that seeks to classify promises of freebies made by political parties during election campaigns as bribes.

A bench led by Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud has tagged this petition alongside other pending cases for consideration.

The plea, filed by Karnataka resident Shashank J. Shreedhara, calls for the Election Commission to implement immediate measures to prohibit political parties from making such promises in the lead-up to elections.

Through advocates Vishwaditya Sharma and Balaji Srinivasan, the petition argues that unregulated promises of freebies impose significant financial burdens on taxpayers and that there is no mechanism in place to ensure that these pre-election commitments are fulfilled.

The petition asserts that promises of freebies especially in cash made by political parties during Assembly or General elections, which are to be funded from public resources if the party comes to power, should be regarded as a corrupt practice under the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

It highlights that parties frequently announce these freebies without disclosing their funding sources, leading to a lack of transparency.

This opacity often results in unfulfilled promises, which the petitioner claims constitutes fraud on the electorate. The plea further argues that such practices create an uneven electoral landscape, where voters are swayed not by candidates’ policies or governance records but by the prospect of immediate benefits.

Consequently, this reduces the electoral process to a transactional one, where votes are effectively bought through future rewards.

The petition underscores that despite the increasing prevalence of these pre-poll promises, the Election Commission has failed to take adequate action to address the issue.

It emphasizes that the Commission, as the guardian of free and fair elections, has a constitutional obligation to prevent unethical practices and ensure that elections maintain the integrity of democracy.

As the Supreme Court considers this matter, the outcome may have significant implications for how political parties campaign and the ethical standards governing electoral promises in India.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago