Supreme Court

SC Issues Notice To Centre, ECI On Plea To Declare ‘Freebies’ As Bribe

The Supreme Court has recently issued a notice to the Centre and the Election Commission of India regarding a plea that seeks to classify promises of freebies made by political parties during election campaigns as bribes.

A bench led by Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud has tagged this petition alongside other pending cases for consideration.

The plea, filed by Karnataka resident Shashank J. Shreedhara, calls for the Election Commission to implement immediate measures to prohibit political parties from making such promises in the lead-up to elections.

Through advocates Vishwaditya Sharma and Balaji Srinivasan, the petition argues that unregulated promises of freebies impose significant financial burdens on taxpayers and that there is no mechanism in place to ensure that these pre-election commitments are fulfilled.

The petition asserts that promises of freebies especially in cash made by political parties during Assembly or General elections, which are to be funded from public resources if the party comes to power, should be regarded as a corrupt practice under the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

It highlights that parties frequently announce these freebies without disclosing their funding sources, leading to a lack of transparency.

This opacity often results in unfulfilled promises, which the petitioner claims constitutes fraud on the electorate. The plea further argues that such practices create an uneven electoral landscape, where voters are swayed not by candidates’ policies or governance records but by the prospect of immediate benefits.

Consequently, this reduces the electoral process to a transactional one, where votes are effectively bought through future rewards.

The petition underscores that despite the increasing prevalence of these pre-poll promises, the Election Commission has failed to take adequate action to address the issue.

It emphasizes that the Commission, as the guardian of free and fair elections, has a constitutional obligation to prevent unethical practices and ensure that elections maintain the integrity of democracy.

As the Supreme Court considers this matter, the outcome may have significant implications for how political parties campaign and the ethical standards governing electoral promises in India.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Telangana Govt Issues Notice To Diljit Dosanjh Ahead Of Hyderabad Concert

The Telangana government has issued a notice to singer-actor Diljit Dosanjh and the organisers of…

1 hour ago

SC Questions Limit On Maternity Leave For Adopting Older Children

The Supreme Court on Friday has questioned the Centre on the rationale behind limiting maternity…

2 hours ago

NGT Acts On Elephant Deaths In Bandhavgarh Tiger Reserve

In a significant development, the National Green Tribunal on Friday has stepped in to investigate…

3 hours ago

SC Directs Centre To Address Rehabilitation For Sex Trafficking Victims

The Supreme Court on Friday has highlighted a legislative gap in the rehabilitation framework for…

3 hours ago

Royal Dowry Dispute Over Rolls-Royce Reaches SC

A high-profile dowry dispute involving a rare 1951 Rolls-Royce, custom-built for the Maharani of Baroda,…

5 hours ago

‘Hamara Samvidhan’ Event Set For Guwahati With Law Minister, CM

Guwahati is set to host the 3rd regional event of the year-long Hamara Samvidhan Hamara…

5 hours ago