Categories: Supreme Court

SC Lawyers Object To Resolutions Proposed By SCBA Against Kapil Sibal And Neeraj Kishan Kaul

The resolutions to reprimand Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal and Advocate Neeraj Kishan Kaul for apologising to the Chief Justice of India for the outbursts of SCBA President Senior Advocate Vikas Singh have angered a number of members of the Supreme Court Bar Association.

At the time of the report’s publication, a letter signed by over 470 lawyers (including 53 senior advocates) was delivered to the SCBA Secretary, requesting that the resolutions filed against Sibal and Kaul be withdrawn.

“We believe that the proposed Resolutions are antithetical to the core values that the SCBA and the Bar are meant to uphold and stand for,” the letter stated, cautioning that calling into question the views expressed by advocates inside a courtroom would be a “unprecedented and dangerous” move by the SCBA.

Fali S Nariman, Mukul Rohatgi, CS Vaidyanathan, Arvind Datar, KV Vishwanathan, Parag Tripathi, Chander Uday Singh, Huzefa Ahmadi, and other notable lawyers have signed on to this letter.

The resolutions proposed against Sibal and Kaul will be considered at the SCBA’s Annual General Body meeting on March 16, 2023.

Background

The controversy stems from events that occurred before the CJI’s bench on March 2, when Senior Advocate Vikas Singh requested an urgent listing of a petition filed by the SCBA demanding room for lawyers’ quarters in the premises given to the Supreme Court by the Central Government. Singh raised his voice, expressing his disappointment that the topic had not been listed despite being raised on multiple previous occasions, which CJI Chandrachud did not appreciate.

During a heated exchange, the Chief Justice asked Singh to leave the Court. Soon after, Senior Counsel Sibal and Advocate Kaul, who were in Court for the Shiv Sena matter, apologised on behalf of the bar for Singh’s outburst.

Following this, almost 200 attorneys wrote to the SCBA suggesting a resolution against Sibal and Kaul for tendering apology “without knowing the matter and without consulting anyone in the Executive Committee”. They demanded that a show-cause notice be issued to the couple, demanding an explanation. Almost 180 lawyers have filed another resolution to show sympathy with Vikas Singh’s attempts to build a chamber.

Expressing distress at the proposed resolutions against Sibal and Kaul, the signatories of the letter stated: “The fact that the SCBA seeks to take affront to the exercise of these very rights, which it is supposed to protect, is therefore, extremely troubling, especially when it is sought to be done in response to statements made at the Bar, and that too in the aftermath of certain events that transpired in the Courtroom of the Hon’ble Chief Justice of India”.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Gulmarg Fashion Show: Srinagar Court To Hear Case Against Organizers On April 8

A Srinagar court has scheduled a hearing for April 8, 2025, in connection with the…

2 days ago

Gold Smuggling Case: Kannada Actress Ranya Rao Moves Sessions Court For Bail

Kannada actress Ranya Rao, arrested last week in connection with a gold smuggling case, has…

2 days ago

“Advocates Can appear In Confiscation Proceedings Under Forest Act”: MP High Court

The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled that advocates can represent clients in confiscation cases under…

2 days ago

Cement Prices Are Likely To Increase Because Of New Mineral Tax By States: Report

Cement prices across various states are expected to increase following a Supreme Court ruling that…

2 days ago

“Plaint Against Teacher By Parent, Student: First Enquiry, Then Arrest”: Kerala HC

The Kerala High Court has laid down new guidelines to protect educators from hasty arrests…

2 days ago

SC Ruling Paves Way For Visually Impaired Judges; Yavnika Shares Her Experience

Supreme Court recently opened up the doors for visually impaired candidates in judiciary by striking…

4 days ago