Supreme Court

SC Notice To Centre On Plea To Declare Ram Setu National Monument

The Supreme Court on Friday sought a response from the Centre on a plea filed by former Rajya Sabha MP Subramanian Swamy, urging the government to take a decision on declaring the Ram Setu as a national monument.

A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta issued notice to the Centre and posted the matter for hearing after four weeks.

Ram Setu And The Plea

Ram Setu, also known as Adam’s Bridge, is a natural chain of limestone shoals connecting Pamban Island off Tamil Nadu’s southeastern coast with Mannar Island in Sri Lanka. The site has long been a matter of historical, archaeological, and religious significance.

In his plea, Swamy argued that the Centre has failed to act on its assurance given to the court in January 2023 that the matter was under consideration. He stressed that the government is duty-bound to protect Ram Setu from pollution, desecration, or misuse, given its cultural and religious importance.

On January 19, 2023, the Supreme Court had recorded the Centre’s submission that the issue of declaring Ram Setu a national heritage monument was being examined by the Ministry of Culture. The Solicitor General had told the court that Swamy could provide additional materials or representations within two weeks for consideration.

The court had then directed the Centre to take a decision and allowed Swamy the liberty to return to court if he was dissatisfied. His interim application was disposed of on that basis.

No Action Yet, Says Swamy

Swamy’s latest petition contends that despite the court’s directions, no decision has been communicated either to him or to the Supreme Court. He said he had submitted a detailed representation to the government on January 27, 2023, with supporting documents, and again sent a fresh representation on May 13, 2025.

The petition underlined that Ram Setu is not only an archaeological site but also a matter of “faith and shradha” for millions who regard it as a pilgrimage site. It added that scientific and archaeological findings support the belief in the structure’s significance, strengthening the case for its protection.

Swamy has requested the apex court to direct the Ministry of Culture to take a time-bound decision on his representations, in line with the January 2023 order.

The court will now hear the matter after 4 weeks, when the Centre is expected to place its stand on record.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtInternational

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago