Supreme Court

SC Petition Calls For Re-Election In 20 Haryana Vidhan Sabha Seats

A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court on Wednesday seeking directions for the Election Commission of India to conduct re-elections in 20 assembly seats in Haryana, citing discrepancies in electronic voting machines and questionable election results.

The petitioners, Priya Mishra and Vikas Bansal, represented by advocate Narendra Mishra, allege that the election results were compromised due to issues with the functioning of EVMs.

The petition claims that some EVMs operated at 99% battery capacity, while others functioned below 80% during the counting process on October 8, 2024.

Notably, discrepancies were found in EVMs at the same polling stations.

The Indian National Congress (INC) reportedly raised these concerns with the Returning Officers, but there was little response.

The petition outlines that the ECI reported voter turnout percentages at various times: 61.19% at 7:25 PM, 65.65% at 11:45 PM on October 5, and an unexpected 67.90% on October 7 before counting began. The petitioners argue that there was no clarification regarding the functioning of the EVMs, raising suspicions about their reliability.

“These charged EVM machines are suspected to support any additional power,” the petition states, questioning the physical impossibility of such occurrences.

The petition calls for the Supreme Court to mandate re-elections in Haryana for the 20 assembly seats, asserting that the discrepancies found in the EVMs undermine the election’s integrity.

Additionally, it requests that the ECI publish all turnout data alongside Form 17C and ensure the secure storage of EVMs and election certificates.

The petitioners emphasize that their Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is filed under Article 32 of the Constitution to protect the democratic process from electoral irregularities.

They aim to ensure free and fair elections and uphold the rule of law, invoking fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution, as well as relevant provisions of the People Representation Act, 1951, and the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961.

As the case proceeds, the petition underscores the critical need for transparency and accountability in the electoral process, reflecting concerns over the integrity of elections in Haryana.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Consensual Sex With Minor Wife Is Rape: Bombay HC Upholds 10-Year Jail For Man

In a landmark ruling, the Bombay High Court has recently confirmed that sexual intercourse with…

1 day ago

SC Directs Centre To Address Menstrual Hygiene Issues In Schools

The Supreme Court on Saturday has directed the Centre to address concerns raised by the…

1 day ago

Money Laundering Case: Delhi Court Grants Regular Bail To Businessman Rajesh Katyal

Businessman Rajesh Katyal, who was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate for allegedly laundering over Rs.200…

2 days ago

CJI Sanjiv Khanna Supports Minimum Stipend For Junior Lawyers

Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna on Friday expressed strong support for the Bar Council…

2 days ago

Appointment Of CPS: HP Govt Moves SC Against HC Order

The Himachal Pradesh government has approached the Supreme Court seeking authorization for the appointment of…

2 days ago

Delhi Court Seeks Police Response On Bibhav Kumar’s Petition Challenging Charge Sheet

Delhi's Tis Hazari Court has issued a notice to the Delhi Police on a revision…

2 days ago