Supreme Court

SC Questions Delhi HC Order Asking Congress To Move ITAT For Stay On Tax Demand

The Supreme Court on Monday raised concerns about the Delhi High Court’s decision directing the Congress party to approach the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for a stay on a tax demand notice of over ₹100 crore.

A bench of Justices BV Nagarathna and N Kotiswar Singh questioned why the high court instructed the Congress to return to the ITAT when it had already appealed against the tribunal’s order. The bench observed, “The high court was not right in not exercising its jurisdiction.”

Despite these concerns, the Supreme Court allowed the ITAT to continue hearing the Congress party’s appeal. Additional Solicitor General N Venkataraman, representing the Income Tax department, informed the court that the recovery of the outstanding amount had already been made, rendering the issue largely academic.

Senior advocate Vivek Tankha, representing the Congress, argued that the high court should have granted an interim stay on the demand notice instead of directing the party to the ITAT.

On March 13, the Delhi High Court had refused to interfere with the ITAT’s order, which declined to stay the Income Tax department’s recovery notice issued on February 13, 2024. The high court, however, allowed the Congress to file a fresh stay application with the ITAT, highlighting that ₹65.94 crore had already been recovered by the department.

The original tax demand, raised by the assessing officer for the assessment year 2018-19, was over ₹100 crore, with the income assessed at more than ₹199 crore. The Congress had argued that the ITAT’s rejection of its stay application was unjustified, but the high court noted that the party had been slow in pursuing its legal remedies.

The Supreme Court has now issued notice to the Income Tax department and clarified that the ongoing special leave petition will not affect the ITAT’s proceedings on the Congress’s plea.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

8 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

8 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

8 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

9 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

9 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

9 hours ago