Supreme Court of India
The Supreme Court on Friday declined to hear a plea challenging the relocation of a sessions court from Machilipatnam to Avanigadda in Andhra Pradesh’s Krishna district, stressing that courts are meant for litigants, not just lawyers.
“Courts are not only for lawyers—they are for litigants. We talk about justice at doorsteps, about gram nyayalayas,” remarked a bench of Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran.
Following the bench’s observation, petitioner Buragadda Ashok Kumar withdrew his plea, which had contested the Andhra Pradesh High Court’s decision to move the VI Additional District and Sessions Court to Avanigadda.
Earlier, Andhra Pradesh High Court rejected objections from the Machilipatnam Bar Association, stating that while the shift might inconvenience lawyers, it would serve litigants better by improving access to justice.
The top court’s remarks underscore its support for decentralizing justice and enhancing accessibility, even if such moves face resistance from the legal fraternity.
Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International
Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…
The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…
The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…
The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…