SC Refuses Petition of Brinda Karat Against BJP Leaders But Refers to Justice KM Joseph Bench

CPIM leader Brinda Karat on Monday left disappointed by the Supreme Court when one of her petitions was referred to Justice KM Joseph Bench for hearing. Brinda Karat filed a Petition in Supreme Court seeking registration of FIR against BJP leaders Anurag Thakur and Parvesh Verma for alleged hate speeches in 2020. The Bench comprising of justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice MM Sundaresh directed petition to the bench headed by Justice KM Joseph because hearing of similar cases.

During Monday’s hearing, Justice Sanjiv Khanna inquired the Counsel pleading for the petitioner if there was a case pending before the Supreme Court on similar matters. The petitioner’s counsel stated that the bench led by Justice KM Joseph was examining a batch of petitions seeking action against hate speech. The bench, remarking that it would be preferable if the case was heard by the same bench, ordered, “Matter be heard by the same panel subject to directions of the Hon’ble Chief Justice.”

It should be noted that a bench led by Justice KM Joseph ordered Suo motu police action against hate speech in October last year, while hearing a batch of petitions related to hate speech incidents during Dharam Sansad events.

The Bench of justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice MM Sundaresh held that in cases when an effective alternative remedy is available, it must be exhausted, and that High Court intervention should be limited to emergent cases in the interest of justice. The plea references to several speeches made by the two politicians including the speech dated January 27, 2020 given by Anurag Thakur at a rally shouting the slogan “desh ke gaddaron ko, goli maaron saalon ko”.

Reference has also been made to another speech made by Parvesh Verma dated January 27-28, 2020, while campaigning for Bhartiya Janata Party .

According to the plea, the speech threatened to use force to remove protestors who were protesting at Shaheen Bagh in the wake of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), as well as to promote hatred and enmity against other communities people by portraying them as invaders.

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Centre Opposes Ex-Judges Panel To Monitor Stubble Burning In SC

The Centre on Friday opposed a proposal in the Supreme Court to form a committee…

6 hours ago

“It’s A Celebration For Us”: Delhi HC Bar Association Felicitates CJI Sanjiv Khanna

The Delhi High Court Bar Association on Friday honored Chief Justice of India Justice Sanjiv…

6 hours ago

International Criminal Court Issues Arrest Warrant For Israeli PM Netanyahu

The International Criminal Court has recently issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,…

7 hours ago

Cal HC Stays Demolition Of Illegal Constructions In WB’s Mandarmoni

The Calcutta High Court on Friday granted an interim stay on the demolition of alleged…

7 hours ago

SC To Pass Order On Pleas To Efface Words ‘Secular’, ‘Socialist’ From Preamble

The Supreme Court on Friday announced that it would deliver its order on November 25…

8 hours ago

Air Pollution: SC Questions Delhi Govt On Truck Entry Amid GRAP-4 Restrictions

The Supreme Court raised concerns on Friday about the "drastic" consequences of the GRAP Stage…

8 hours ago