Supreme Court

SC Refuses to Entertain PIL Alleging Use of Public Servants for Govt Propaganda

The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to entertain a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking the annulment of a letter issued by the Controller General of Defence Accounts and an office memorandum from the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT).

These documents aimed to utilize public servants to highlight government achievements.

A bench of Justices B R Gavai and Prashant Kumar Mishra acknowledged lawyer Prashant Bhushan’s submissions but expressed disinclination to proceed with what they referred to as a “publicity interest litigation.”

Bhushan argued that the ruling party allegedly intends to use public servants to promote its work for electoral benefits, emphasizing the seriousness of the matter. However, the bench dismissed the PIL as withdrawn, granting the petitioner the liberty to approach the high court.

The PIL, filed by EAS Sarma and Jagdeep S Chhokar, sought the invalidation of the Controller General of Defence Accounts’ October 9, 2023 letter instructing the establishment of “selfie-points” to showcase the Ministry of Defence’s accomplishments. The PIL also contested the DoPT’s October 17, 2023 office memorandum, which deployed government officials as ‘district rath prabharis’ for a nationwide campaign called ‘Viksit Bharat Sankalp Yatra’ from November 20, 2023, to January 25, 2024.

In addition to seeking the cancellation of the letter and memorandum, the PIL requested a declaration prohibiting any ruling party from using public servants, directly or indirectly, for campaigns or promotions benefiting the party.

The plea emphasized the need to uphold the fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution, safeguarding civil services and the armed forces from being instrumentalized for political party election campaigns. The PIL argued that the government’s actions not only violate service rules but also disrupt free and fair elections, a crucial aspect of democracy.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

12 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

12 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

12 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

13 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

13 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

13 hours ago