Supreme Court

SC Refuses to Entertain Plea Challenging Colonial-Era Shariat Law

The Supreme Court has declined to entertain a plea addressing the matter of succession in accordance with the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, stating that such issues fall within the legislative domain, and personal laws vary for individuals belonging to different religions.

The plea contended that the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 mandates that Muslims in India shall be governed by Shariat law concerning matters of intestate succession, marriage, dissolution of marriage, maintenance, etc.

A bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Sudhanshu Dhulia remarked that the legislature may establish a common law on succession and questioned the idea of equal inheritance rights under different religious laws, such as Hindu and Muslim laws.

Advocate Mathews J Nedumpara, representing the petitioner, argued that, according to Shariat law, the petitioner, a Muslim woman, is entitled to only 12.5 percent of the estates of her late husband. He asserted that all citizens, regardless of their religion, should have equal inheritance rights.

The bench highlighted the diversity of personal laws for people of different religions and dismissed the plea, stating that the demand for a common law of succession is a matter for the legislative domain.

In its order, the bench stated, “We cannot accede to the prayer made in the writ petition, which amounts to giving equal rights in succession, irrespective of the religion. If this has to happen, it is the legislative domain. The writ petition is, accordingly dismissed.”

The woman’s plea sought the enforcement of her fundamental right to just and equitable inheritance of the estates of her late husband, arguing that this right was denied by the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937.

The plea sought a declaration from the apex court that widows, daughters, and mothers of a Muslim man who died intestate are entitled to an equitable share of estates, properties, and assets, similar to other communities’ personal laws.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

10 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

10 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

10 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

11 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

11 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

11 hours ago