Supreme Court

SC Refuses To Stay Panchayat Election In Punjab

The Supreme Court has declined to stay the ongoing panchayat elections in Punjab, emphasizing that halting the electoral process is a “grave thing”.

A bench led by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, along with Justices J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, noted that interrupting elections after polling has begun could lead to “chaos.”

The bench refused to issue an interim order to halt polling, which commenced on Tuesday morning, highlighting the necessity of judicial restraint in election matters. “Polling has opened; if we stay now, there will be complete chaos. Stopping elections is a serious issue. Tomorrow, someone might want to stay parliamentary elections as well. We will list the case, but no interim stay,” the bench stated.

This discussion arose from a request to the Supreme Court for a stay on the polling. Earlier, the Punjab and Haryana High Court had lifted its own stay on the panchayat polls, allowing elections to proceed.

The Supreme Court appeal challenged a High Court ruling that dismissed around 800 petitions alleging irregularities in the electoral process.

Voting for the gram panchayat elections is currently taking place from 8 am to 4 pm, with citizens using ballot boxes to elect their ‘sarpanch’ and ‘panch’ representatives. Reports indicate that voters in Mohali and Ludhiana are actively participating, and the process has been peaceful thus far. Election results are expected once voting concludes.

Yesterday, the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed over 1,000 petitions seeking the cancellation of the elections and lifted a ban on 206 panchayats, allowing the electoral process to move forward as scheduled on October 15.

The court clarified that only the Election Commission holds the authority to intervene in the elections and mandated that the entire process be documented through videography.

Despite the High Court’s decision, petitioners’ attorneys indicated plans to challenge the ruling in the Supreme Court, reflecting the ongoing legal disputes surrounding the elections. The elections aim to fill 13,237 ‘Sarpanches’ and 83,437 ‘Panches’ positions.

Advocate Hakam Singh mentioned that nearly 1,000 writ petitions had been filed regarding the elections, with 250 being segregated on various grounds.

While the High Court dismissed all but one petition, the legal battle appears far from over, with intentions to approach the Supreme Court once more.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

“Probe Can’t Be Thwarted By Quashing FIR If Materials Show Prima Facie Case”: SC

The Supreme Court has clarified that when a FIR indicates dishonest conduct by an accused,…

1 hour ago

“No Bar On MLC Appointments”: Maharashtra Govt To Bombay HC

The Maharashtra government informed the Bombay High Court on Tuesday that there were no obstacles…

1 hour ago

Remark On Hospitals Condition: SC Issues Fresh Notice To UP Govt On AAP Leader’s Plea

The Supreme Court issued a fresh notice on Tuesday to the Uttar Pradesh government regarding…

2 hours ago

Bombay HC Grants Anticipatory Bail To Ex-Goa RSS Chief Velingkar

The Goa bench of the Bombay High Court granted anticipatory bail on Tuesday to former…

2 hours ago

“Benchmark Disability No Grounds For Denying Admission To MBBS Courses”: SC

The Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that the mere existence of a benchmark disability can't…

3 hours ago

SC Issues Notice To Centre, ECI On Plea To Declare ‘Freebies’ As Bribe

The Supreme Court has recently issued a notice to the Centre and the Election Commission…

4 hours ago