Supreme Court

SC Rejects PIL Alleging Voter Secrecy Violation

The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) alleging a violation of voter secrecy in the existing electoral system, stating that there was no merit in the petition.

A bench comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta dismissed the petition and informed the petitioner’s counsel of their decision.

What the Apex Court Said?

The bench noted that the petitioner’s counsel had not read the April 26 verdict of the apex court, which rejected allegations of manipulation of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs). The counsel for petitioner Agnostos Theos claimed that a polling officer could see the VVPAT slips and the data stored in the polling device.

“From the VVPAT slips and data in EVMs, the presiding officer can identify which voter cast his vote for which party,” he asserted. The bench responded that had he reviewed the April 26 verdict, he would not have made this submission.

‘No Merit’

“There is no way a presiding officer can know which voter cast his vote for which party. Go through the verdict. We find no merit in the petition. Dismissed,” the bench declared.

On April 26, the Supreme Court had termed the suspicion over manipulation of EVMs as “unfounded” and rejected the demand to revert to the old paper ballot system, stating that the polling devices were “secure” and helped eliminate booth capturing and bogus voting. However, the apex court opened a window for aggrieved unsuccessful candidates securing second and third places, allowing them to seek verification of microcontroller chips embedded in five percent of EVMs per assembly constituency on a written request upon payment of a fee to the poll panel.

It directed that from May 1, the symbol loading units (SLU) should be sealed and secured in a container and stored in a strongroom along with the EVMs for a minimum period of 45 days after the declaration of results.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, Other Courts, International

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Allahabad HC Transfers 12 District Judge-Level Officials

In a significant judicial reshuffle, the Allahabad High Court administration on Friday transferred 12 judicial…

53 minutes ago

‘Eradicate Sanatan Dharma’ Remark: SC Defers Hearing Plea Of Udhayanidhi Stalin

The Supreme Court on Friday deferred the hearing on Tamil Nadu Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin's plea…

1 hour ago

2013 Rape Case: SC Notices Gujarat Govt On Asaram’s Plea Seeking Sentence Suspension

The Supreme Court on Friday sought a response from the Gujarat government regarding self-styled godman…

2 hours ago

SC Issues Notice On Manish Sisodia Plea Seeking Relaxation Of Bail Conditions

The Supreme Court on Friday issued notices to the Central Bureau of Investigation and Enforcement…

2 hours ago

SC Stays Disqualification Of 6 CPS In HP Govt

The Supreme Court on Friday temporarily halted the disqualification process of 6 Chief Parliamentary Secretaries…

2 hours ago

A.R. Rahman, Saira Banu’s Lawyer Vandana Shah Reveals Reasons For Divorce

Renowned music composer A.R. Rahman and his wife, Saira Banu, recently announced their separation after…

3 hours ago