SC Rejects PIL Seeking Round-The-Clock Digital Monitoring Of Lawmakers For Better Governance

The Supreme Court on Friday has trashed a PIL seeking a direction to the Centre to digitally monitor MPs and MLAs round the clock for better governance, saying ”there is something called right to privacy also.”

A bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice JP Pardiwala and Justice Manoj Misra asked whether the court can put a ”chip” in the body of the lawmakers to track their movement round the clock.

The CJI cautioned petitioner Surinder Nath Kundra (Delhi resident), that he should be ready to pay Rs.5 lakh as a fine for misusing the judicial time on such an issue.

The bench stated that, ”If you argue and we don’t agree with you then a cost of Rs 5 lakh will be recovered from you as land revenue. This is public time and this is not about our ego.”

It stated that, ”Do you realise what you are arguing? You want 24/7 monitoring of MPs & MLAs. This is done only for a convicted felon who can flee justice. There is something called right to privacy and we cannot digitally monitor all elected members of Parliament.”

Kundra stated that MPs and MLAs, who are ”paid servants of citizens”, have started behaving like rulers.

At this, the bench stated, ”You can’t make a common charge against all MPs.” The top court said that in all democracies, individuals can’t make laws which have to be enacted through elected lawmakers only.

The CJI posed, ‘Then people will say ok, we do not need judges. We will decide on the streets and kill the offender for theft. Do we want that to happen?”

The bench stated the plea seeking digital monitoring of MPs and MLAs can’t be entertained.

The CJI stated while trashing the PIL, ”We place the petitioner on notice of the fact that this court will impose costs if he pursues the cases. However, we desist from imposing costs with a caution that no such plea should be filed in the future.”

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

10 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

10 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

10 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

11 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

11 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

11 hours ago