Supreme Court

SC Rejects Plea Seeking Termination of Over 26-Week Pregnancy

The Supreme Court on Monday declined to grant permission for the termination of pregnancy to a married woman, who is a mother of two, as her pregnancy had exceeded 26 weeks and the AIIMS medical board found no abnormalities in the foetus.

A bench led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud said that the duration of the pregnancy had surpassed the permissible 24-week limit for Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP). The court further noted that the foetus was 26 weeks and 5 days old, and the mother was not facing an immediate threat. Additionally, no foetal abnormalities were identified.

The Apex Court emphasized that the legal challenge to the pregnancy termination law would be addressed separately, while the present case would solely address the matter between the petitioner and the State. Previously, the court had requested a report from the AIIMS medical board to determine whether the foetus had any abnormalities.

The case revolved around the Centre’s application to reverse the Supreme Court’s October 9 order, which had allowed a 27-year-old woman, a mother of two, to undergo pregnancy termination at AIIMS due to her post-partum psychosis after her second child’s birth.

According to the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, married women, special categories such as rape survivors, vulnerable women like the differently-abled and minors, have an upper limit of 24 weeks for pregnancy termination.

The Top Court grappled with the ethical dilemma of whether to permit the woman to terminate her 26-week pregnancy, balancing the rights of the unborn child with the woman’s right to bodily autonomy. The dilemma emerged after one of the AIIMS medical board doctors, who had examined the woman and submitted a report on October 6, sent an email on October 10 indicating a strong possibility of the foetus’s survival.

This matter reached the bench led by the Chief Justice following a split verdict by a two-judge bench regarding the Centre’s plea to reconsider its October 9 order granting permission for the woman to terminate her pregnancy.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

“Not All Private Properties Can Be Acquired Under Article 39(b)”: SC

A 9-judge bench of the Supreme Court delivered a significant ruling on Tuesday regarding the…

25 mins ago

Karnataka HC Notices CM On Plea To Transfer MUDA Case To CBI

The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday has issued a notice to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and…

2 hours ago

Delhi HC Dismisses PIL For Councillors’ Fund Increase, Advises Raising Of Issue In MCD House

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday dismissed a Public Interest Litigation filed by MCD Councillor…

2 hours ago

“States Can’t Seize All Private Properties For Common Good”: SC

In a landmark 7:2 ruling on Tuesday, the Supreme Court declared that states do not…

2 hours ago

“Judicial Independence Isn’t Just Delivering Anti-Government Verdicts”: CJI DY Chandrachud

Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud has recently emphasized that judicial independence doesn't equate to consistently ruling…

3 hours ago

SC Upholds Validity Of UP Board Of Madarsa Education Act

The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld the constitutional validity of the Uttar Pradesh Board of…

3 hours ago