Supreme Court

SC Restrains Trial Court From Taking Note Of Chargesheet Against Ashoka University Professor

The Supreme Court on Monday restrained a Haryana trial court from taking cognisance of the chargesheet filed against Ashoka University professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad, who was booked earlier this year for social media posts related to Operation Sindoor.

A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi directed that no charges be framed in the case until further orders.

During the hearing, the court was informed that the Special Investigation Team, constituted on the court’s orders, had completed its probe into the 2 FIRs lodged against Mahmudabad in May. The SIT told the bench that it had filed a closure report in one case, but in the 2nd FIR, a chargesheet was submitted on August 22, after concluding that “some offences were made out.”

Sibal Objects To Sedition Charge

Appearing for Mahmudabad, senior advocate Kapil Sibal termed the filing of the chargesheet “most unfortunate,” pointing out that it invoked Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) — the provision replacing sedition law — whose constitutional validity is under challenge.

“They have booked him under Section 152, whose validity is under challenge,” Sibal argued.

The bench asked Sibal to review the chargesheet and submit a chart of the alleged offences for detailed consideration at the next hearing.

One FIR Quashed, SIT Under Scrutiny

The Supreme Court noted that proceedings related to the FIR in which a closure report was filed should be quashed. It also reiterated its earlier observation questioning why the Haryana SIT’s investigation “misdirected itself.”

Last month, the court directed the constitution of a three-member SIT to probe the FIRs, citing concerns about the fairness of the initial investigation.

Case Background

On May 18, Mahmudabad was arrested after 2 FIRs were registered against him in Sonipat district over alleged “objectionable” posts on social media concerning Operation Sindoor. The complaints were filed by Haryana State Commission for Women chairperson Renu Bhatia and a local sarpanch.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtInternational

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago