Supreme Court

SC Rules Stay Trial Court or High Court Can not Vacate Automatically

The Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that stay orders granted by lower or higher courts in civil and criminal cases cannot automatically lapse after six months. Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud, leading a five-judge Constitution Bench, disagreed with a previous 2018 ruling that mandated the automatic vacation of such stay orders unless explicitly extended.

Providing guidance, the judgment emphasized that constitutional courts, including the Supreme Court and high courts, should refrain from setting deadlines for case disposal, reserving such actions for exceptional circumstances.

The Bench delivered two separate but concurring judgments. Justice A S Oka stated, “Constitutional courts should refrain from setting timelines for case decisions, as the specific circumstances of each case are best understood by the concerned courts.” He added, “There should be no automatic vacation of stay orders,” echoing the sentiments of himself, the Chief Justice, and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra.

Justice Pankaj Mithal penned a separate yet concurring opinion in the matter.

The Supreme Court had reserved its decision on December 13, 2023, after hearing arguments from senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, representing the High Court Bar Association of Allahabad, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, and other attorneys.

Previously, on December 1 of the preceding year, the Supreme Court had referred its 2018 ruling to a five-judge bench for reconsideration. This earlier ruling had stipulated that stay orders granted by lower or higher courts would automatically expire after six months unless specifically extended.

The 2018 verdict, issued in the case of Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency P Ltd Director Vs CBI by a three-judge bench, mandated the automatic vacation of interim stay orders unless explicitly extended, leading to no trial or proceedings remaining stayed beyond six months. However, the Supreme Court later clarified that this judgment would not apply if the stay order originated from itself.

Ashish Sinha

-Ashish Kumar Sinha -Editor Legally Speaking -Ram Nath Goenka awardee - 14 Years of Experience in Media - Covering Courts Since 2008

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

3 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

3 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

3 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

3 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

3 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

3 months ago